Re: Bleeding Risk and Management in Interventional Procedures in Chronic Liver Disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1336-1337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ton Lisman
2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 922-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gia A. DeAngelis ◽  
Rachita Khot ◽  
Ziv J Haskal ◽  
Hillary S. Maitland ◽  
Patrick G. Northup ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 921-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Sarode ◽  
Deepak Agrawal ◽  
Michael Cripps ◽  
Sanjeeva P. Kalva ◽  
Srikanth Nagalla

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 1665-1674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gia A. DeAngelis ◽  
Rachita Khot ◽  
Ziv J Haskal ◽  
Hillary S. Maitland ◽  
Patrick G. Northup ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1337-1338
Author(s):  
Gia A. DeAngelis ◽  
Rachita Khot ◽  
Ziv J Haskal ◽  
Hillary S. Maitland ◽  
Patrick G. Northup ◽  
...  

Platelets ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 796-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven R. Olson ◽  
Steven Koprowski ◽  
Justine Hum ◽  
Owen J.T. McCarty ◽  
Thomas G. DeLoughery ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (06) ◽  
pp. 682-692
Author(s):  
Saro Khemichian ◽  
Norah A. Terrault

AbstractThrombocytopenia is one of the most common hematologic complications in cirrhosis. Despite limited data linking platelet count and bleeding risk in patients with cirrhosis, the use of platelets transfusions for invasive procedures has been a common practice. Recently, thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonists have been approved for use in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) undergoing invasive procedures. The aim of this study was to review current literature on bleeding risk in patients with cirrhosis and the use of platelet transfusions and TPO receptor agonists in the context of invasive procedures. PubMed search was conducted to find articles relating to cirrhosis, thrombocytopenia, and new novel treatments for this condition. Search terms included CLD, cirrhosis, thrombocytopenia, bleeding, thrombosis, coagulopathy, hemostasis, and TPO receptor agonists. Romiplostim, eltrombopag, avatrombopag, and lusutrombopag are approved TPO receptor agonists, with avatrombopag and lusutrombopag specifically approved for use in patients with CLD undergoing invasive procedures. In patients with platelet counts < 50,000/mm3, avatrombopag and lusutrombopag increased the platelet counts above this threshold in the majority of treated patients and reduced the frequency of platelet transfusions. At the approved doses, incidence of thrombosis was not increased and therapies were well tolerated. Studies were not powered to assess whether risk of bleeding complications was reduced and the fundamental question of whether correction of thrombocytopenia is warranted in patients undergoing invasive procedures remains unanswered. The use of TPO receptor agonists has resulted in less requirement for platelet transfusions. In patients with cirrhosis undergoing invasive procedures for whom platelet transfusion is planned, TPO receptor agonists are an alternative and avoid the risks associated with transfusions. However, there is need for a thoughtful approach to manage bleeding risk in patients with cirrhosis undergoing procedures, with the consideration of a comprehensive hemostatic profile, the severity of portal hypertension, and the complexity of the invasive procedure to guide decisions regarding transfusions or use of TPO receptor agonists.


2017 ◽  
Vol 01 (04) ◽  
pp. 306-312
Author(s):  
Brett Fortune ◽  
David Madoff ◽  
Benjamin May

AbstractInvasive procedures are common in the management of cirrhosis-related chronic liver disease (CLD). Assessing bleeding risk prior to these procedures is challenging because of commonly seen laboratory abnormalities among traditional testing used to evaluate bleeding risk in patients with advanced liver disease. However, this ‘coagulopathy’ seen in advanced liver disease is not a true bleeding or clotting disorder. The prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR) test is frequently elevated in CLD patients, but has been shown to poorly correlate with bleeding risk in this population. A traditional interpretation of this laboratory test can lead to unnecessary transfusion of blood product, procedure delay, or even potential harm to the patient. An understanding of the ‘coagulopathy’ of advanced liver disease and alternative methods, to more accurately assess bleeding risk, allows clinicians to treat safely CLD patients.


2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 905-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Buresi ◽  
Russell Hull ◽  
Carla S Coffin

Although hemorrhage has traditionally been regarded as the most significant hemostatic complication of liver disease, there is increasing recognition that hypercoagulability is a prominent aspect of cirrhosis. Identifying markers of coagulability and monitoring anticoagulation therapy in the setting of cirrhosis is problematic. The bleeding risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis and treatment in patients with chronic liver disease is unclear and there are currently no recommendations to guide practice in this regard. In the present report, the mechanism of coagulation disturbance in chronic liver disease is reviewed with an examination of the evidence for an increased VTE risk in cirrhosis. Finally, the available evidence is assessed for prophylaxis and therapy of VTE in chronic liver disease, and the role it may play in decreasing clinical decompensation and improving survival.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document