scholarly journals Stent Graft Placement for Aneurysmal Degeneration After Long-Term Medical Therapy for Type B Aortic Dissection Results in Volumetric Gain of the True Lumen and False Lumen Regression

2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 87S
Author(s):  
Jean Marie Ruddy ◽  
Bradley G. Leshnower ◽  
Paul Reisenman ◽  
James G. Reeves ◽  
Luke P. Brewster ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Gasparetto ◽  
Kwang Bo Park ◽  
Saher S. Sabri ◽  
Auh Whan Park ◽  
Alan H. Matsumoto ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiang Xiong ◽  
Yangyang Ge ◽  
Xiaoping Liu ◽  
Lijun Wang ◽  
Wei Guo

Purpose: To describe the use and 6-month outcomes of the octopus endograft technique to reconstruct renovisceral arteries arising from the false lumen (FL) of a type B aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Case Report: A 46-year-old man post TEVAR for type B aortic dissection was admitted with persistent back pain and a rapidly expanding residual dissection. The celiac and left renal arteries arose from the FL and the superior mesenteric artery from both lumens, with the FL as its main supply. A 20% oversized Endurant stent-graft was deployed with the short limb just above the beginning of the dissection flap and the long limb in the aortic true lumen. A 120-mm-long Endurant extended limb was delivered antegradely via a conduit and deployed into the FL, with a 3-cm overlap with the short limb of the Endurant main body. The 3 renovisceral arteries were reconstructed by lining each with a series of Viabahn or Fluency stent-grafts whose proximal ends were subsequently placed parallel in the FL Endurant extended limb and dilated with kissing balloons. Imaging at 6 months showed an excluded FL, without stenosis or occlusion in the stent-graft or the renovisceral arteries. Conclusion: This case illustrates the successful use of the octopus endograft technique to reconstruct renovisceral arteries arising from a rapidly expanding FL in a post-TEVAR type B aortic dissection; the technique might be applicable in carefully selected patients.


Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ung Kim ◽  
Seong-Jin Hong ◽  
Jung-Sun Kim ◽  
Young-Guk Ko ◽  
Dong-hoon Choi ◽  
...  

The aim of this study is to assess mid- to long-term clinical results of the endovascular stent-graft repair in patients with type B aortic dissection. Retrospective analysis was done on 73 patients (average age: 55.6 ± 12.4) who underwent stent-graft repair at our center from June 1994 to December 2007. The indications of case selection were progression of dissection despite adequate medical treatment, dynamic obstruction, intractable pain, aortic diameter of 6cm or more, or continuous false lumen leakage in either acute or chronic presentation. Median follow-up duration was 43 months (5 ~ 97 months, 64.4 ± 38.8 months). There was an absence of immediate postprocedural mortality or paraplegia. Angiographic success, defined as immediate closure of entry site without any significant endoleak, was obtained in 67/73 (91.7%) patients. Clinical success, defined as the complete obliteration or complete thrombosis of the false lumen at follow-up, was achieved in 53/73 (72.6%) patients. 22/73 (30.1%) patients demonstrated complications such as persistent type I endoleak, false lumen flow patency at distal portion of stent-graft, and 5/73 (6.8%) patients such as type II endoleak. Among these endoleaks, 5 cases were progressed and 17 cases were remained unchanged. There were unintended left subclavian artery occlusion (1 case), transient acute renal failure (1 case), saccular aneurysm (5 cases) and stent-graft migration or torsion (2 cases) as complications. During medial follow-up 43 months, 4 patients (5.5%) were died. In conclusion, cIinical outcomes of stent-graft repair of type B aortic dissection were favorable and should be considered as a safe and effective treatment option of type B aortic dissection, particularly in patients with a high risk surgical mortality or mobility.


2010 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christof Karmonik ◽  
Jean Bismuth ◽  
Mark G. Davies ◽  
Dipan J. Shah ◽  
Houssam K. Younes ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 244-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maartje C. Loubert ◽  
Victor P.M. van der Hulst ◽  
Cees De Vries ◽  
Kees Bloemendaal ◽  
Anco C. Vahl

Purpose: To report techniques for excluding the dilated false lumen associated with chronic type B aortic dissection following placement of a stent-graft in the true lumen. Case Reports: Two patients underwent stent-graft implantation for a dilated false lumen after chronic aortic dissection, but the false lumen was not excluded from the circulation by this procedure. The false lumen was obliterated in one case with Greenfield filters and detachable balloons placed above a renal artery orifice that was perfused via the false lumen. This acted like “a cork in the bottleneck” to block retrograde flow into the thoracic portion of the false lumen above the blockade. In the other patient, an occluder device was used as the “cork.” In both cases, a good result was obtained. The occluder device is preferred because deployment is more controllable. Conclusions: An occluder device may be used like a cork in a bottle to exclude the dilated false lumen in the thoracic aorta after a type B dissection.


2020 ◽  
pp. 152660282096699
Author(s):  
Yaowang Lin ◽  
Shaohong Dong ◽  
Jianfan Luo ◽  
Weijie Bei ◽  
Qiyun Liu ◽  
...  

Purpose To compare the clinical outcomes after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with a bare stent to those after TEVAR alone in patients with complicated acute type B aortic dissection (cATBAD). Materials and Methods A prospective, randomized trial was conducted at 2 medical centers in China between 2010 and 2013. Patients with cATBAD were randomly assigned to receive TEVAR with a bare stent (n=42) or TEVAR only (n=42). Patients were scheduled to undergo computed tomography angiography at 3, 6, and 12 months and then annually to 5 years. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 5 years; secondary outcomes were a composite of complications (endoleak, stent-graft–induced new entry, aortic rupture, and secondary intervention) and aortic remodeling at 1 and 5 years. Results All-cause death occurred in 1 (2.4%) patient in the TEVAR with bare stent group (lung cancer) and 5 patients (11.9%) in the TEVAR group (4 aorta-related) during the 5-year follow-up (log-rank p=0.025). The 1- and 5-year rates of complications and secondary interventions did not differ between the groups. Patients in the TEVAR with bare stent group had higher increases in the thoracic true lumen diameter (19.7±3.6 vs 17.0±6.2 mm, p=0.018) and abdominal true lumen diameter (13.7±4.8 vs 7.2±6.1 mm, p<0.001) and a higher incidence of complete false lumen thrombosis (80.9% vs 47.6%, p=0.005) at the 1-year follow-up. However, no between-group differences in the changes of aortic remodeling parameters were observed between the 1- and 5-year follow-up periods. Conclusion The addition of a distal bare stent to a thoracic stent-graft during TEVAR was associated with significantly improved long-term survival in cATBAD patients vs TEVAR only, likely due to the prevention of true lumen collapse and improvement of complete false lumen thrombosis of the dissected aorta.


2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. A-6-A-6

In the December 2006 issue, Dr. Bünger, one of the co-authors of “Provisional Extension to Induce Complete Attachment After Stent-Graft Placement in Type B Aortic Dissection: The PETTICOAT Concept” (2006;13:738–746), has requested that his name appears as Carsten Michael Bünger, MD; his middle name did not appear in the original article. The electronic versions of the article in both HTML and PDF have been revised to reflect this correction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document