scholarly journals Cannabis clinical research in purgatory: Canadian researchers caught between an inflexible regulatory environment and a conflicted industry.

2022 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 100171
Author(s):  
Sergio Rueda ◽  
Elizabeth Limanto ◽  
Michael Chaiton
2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 489-491
Author(s):  
Rebecca Ilyas ◽  
Karyee Chow ◽  
J Graham Young

Background: Contributing to clinical research is generally personally and professionally rewarding for urologists. The regulatory environment can seem daunting and this paper guides a new consultant through the initial steps to plan and commence a project. Objectives: The objective of this study was to guide a new consultant in planning and implementing a clinical research project by providing a detailed review on how to start and conduct a clinical project. Methods: Research committees and bodies that offer funding and help were researched thoroughly and an intensive guideline was written to help new trainees and consultants to begin and implement clinical research. Conclusions: The necessary information required to conduct and implement a clinical research project for a new consultant.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon E. Kolstoe ◽  
David Carpenter

Abstract Background In their paper “Research approvals iceberg: how a ‘low-key’ study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better” Petrova and Barclay highlight concerns with the health research regulatory environment in the UK. Discussion As long-standing chairs of NHS research ethics committees, researchers, and also academics in research ethics, we are also often frustrated with the regulatory process in the UK. However, we think that Petrova and Barclay’s analysis is misleading because it conflates research ethics with governance and funding processes, thus failing to adequately distinguish between the national coordinating function of the Health Research Authority, local research governance processes, and interactions with research sponsors and/or the Clinical Research Network.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clemens Decristoforo ◽  
Oliver Neels ◽  
Marianne Patt

Recent years have seen the establishment of several radionuclides as medicinal products in particular in the setting of theranostics and PET. [177Lu]Lutetium Chloride or [64Cu]Copper Chloride have received marketing authorization as radionuclide precursor, [68Ga]Gallium Chloride has received regulatory approval in the form of different 68Ge/68Ga generators. This is a formal requirement by the EU directive 2001/83, even though for some of these radionuclide precursors no licensed kit is available that can be combined to obtain a final radiopharmaceuticals, as it is the case for Technetium-99m. In view of several highly promising, especially metallic radionuclides for theranostic applications in a wider sense, the strict regulatory environment poses the risk of slowing down development, in particular for radionuclide producers that want to provide innovative radionuclides for clinical research purposes, which is the basis for their further establishment. In this paper we address the regulatory framework for novel radionuclides within the EU, the current challenges in particular related to clinical translation and potential options to support translational development within Europe and worldwide.


2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Deborah Chee ◽  
Min Soo Park ◽  
Ji-Hoon Sohn

Korea has continuously sought to improve its regulatory environment for clinical trials and has invested heavily in clinical trial infrastructure and technology since the early 2000’s. A strategic investment through the Korea National Enterprise for Clinical Trials (KoNECT) program began in 2007 and grew to encompass a network of regional clinical trial centers to promote clinical trial capabilities and human resource development. In early 2014, KoNECT became a permanent organization focused on the advancement of the country's clinical trial industry. This was followed by the establishment of the Korea Clinical Trials Global Initiative (KCGI) and the KoNECT Collaboration Center for global clinical trials (KCC). KCGI and KCC are now at the forefront of KoNECT’s efforts to promote higher operational efficiency in the country’s clinical trials. These new initiatives in clinical research are undertaking multichannel approaches to pursue a cohesive international collaboration model between government, industry and academia for the development of new treatments and improved patient care.


1984 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 448-452
Author(s):  
LA Tedesco ◽  
JE Albino ◽  
WM Feagans ◽  
RS Mackenzie

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 9-11
Author(s):  
Madalena Walsh ◽  
Nan Bernstein Ratner
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document