Forensic-psychiatric assessment of the risk of terrorist radicalisation in the mentally ill patient

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Fernández García-Andrade ◽  
Beatriz Serván Rendón-Luna ◽  
Blanca Reneses Prieto ◽  
Virginia Vidal Martínez ◽  
Elena Medina Téllez de Meneses ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S591-S591
Author(s):  
S. Khouadja ◽  
S. Younes ◽  
S. Chatti ◽  
R. Ben Soussia ◽  
L. Zarrouk ◽  
...  

IntroductionMany studies have shown that schizophrenic patients are responsible for the highest rates of violence among all the mentally ill patients.Aims of the studyDescribe the socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with schizophrenia examined in a forensic psychiatric assessment and identify the risk factors of violence in these patients.MethodologyA retrospective study carried out in the psychiatric department of university hospital of Mahdia during fifteen years involving 40 patients with schizophrenia examined in a forensic psychiatric assessment following a forensic act. These patients were compared to a population of 40 patients followed in the same establishment for the same disease and without criminal record.ResultsAge average of 36.08 years, male (95%), rural origin (65%), primary level education (47.5%), single (65%), unemployed (65%) and average socio-economic level (65%). Personal psychiatric history (87.5%), personality disorder (12.5%), judiciary history (12.5%) and substance abuse (57.5%). Subtypes of schizophrenia: undifferentiated (52.5%) and paranoid (30%). They have committed serious physical assaults (55%) and aggression against property (27.5%). The victim was mostly a family member (40%), under the influence of toxic (22%), driven by delusions of persecution (61%), with hallucinatory mechanism (55%). The psychiatric expert has concluded an abolition of discernment in 77.5% of cases. Risk factors of acting out were: rural origin, alcohol and psychoactive substances use, productive forms of schizophrenia, poor adherence and irregular monitoring.ConclusionThe knowledge of risk factors improves the management and allows us better prevention of violence among our patients.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Sygel ◽  
Joakim Sturup ◽  
Uno Fors ◽  
Hanna Edberg ◽  
Joakim Gavazzeni ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 23 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 467-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rüdiger Müller-Isberner ◽  
Roland Freese ◽  
Dieter Jöckel ◽  
Sara Gonzalez Cabeza

1998 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 722-727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter C. Gaughwin

Objective and Method: This article examines some of the ethical and legal issues which confront the psychiatrist who is asked to provide a forensic psychiatric assessment. Theory is explained and illustrated by way of a case study. Results: Recent cases demonstrate a tendency by some psychiatrists to adopt an advocacy role in legal proceedings, to the potential disadvantage of not only those involved in the proceedings, but also to the wider community. Conclusion: Ideally, there is a need for a greater collaborative effort between the College's Ethics Committee and this Country's Courts and Law Societies to establish and monitor an ethical framework in the area of expert psychiatric evidence.


2021 ◽  
pp. 13-24
Author(s):  
N.K. Kharitonova ◽  
O.A. Rusakovskaya ◽  
M.A. Kachaeva ◽  
V.I. Vasyanina ◽  
M.A. Hristoforova

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document