Salvage of Failed Resection Arthroplasties of the Distal Radioulnar Joint Using an Ulnar Head Prosthesis: Long-term Results

Author(s):  
R. Grewal
2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 1372-1380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg van Schoonhoven ◽  
Marion Mühldorfer-Fodor ◽  
Diego L. Fernandez ◽  
Timothy J. Herbert

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. D. Adams ◽  
J. L. Gaffey

A variety of surgical techniques are used to treat the arthritic distal radioulnar joint, which is influenced by aetiology and previous procedures. Four types of ulnar head arthroplasty exist: total ulnar head, partial ulnar head, unlinked total distal radioulnar joint, and linked distal radioulnar joint. Although long-term outcome studies are sparse, short-term clinical and biomechanical studies have shown encouraging results, leading to expanded indications. Based on our experience and a literature review, patients are advised that pain is improved but minor pain is common after strenuous activity. Ulnar neck resorption is common, however, implant loosening is rare. Sigmoid notch erosion is concerning, but appears to stabilize and not affect outcome. A partial ulnar head replacement that retains bony architecture and soft tissue restraints may have benefit over a total ulnar head in appropriate patients. If appropriate selection criteria are met, ulnar head replacement typically produces reliable results, with low revision.


2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 186-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Fuchs ◽  
L.A. Meier ◽  
T. Giesen ◽  
M. Calcagni ◽  
L. Reissner

2000 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 438-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg van Schoonhoven ◽  
Diego L. Fernandez ◽  
William H. Bowers ◽  
Timothy J. Herbert

2000 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. SALON ◽  
M. SERRA ◽  
J. C. POULIQUEN

Eleven wrists with painful Madelung deformity in seven patients were corrected during adolescence by a closing wedge osteotomy of the radius and a shortening osteotomy of the ulna, with conservation of the distal radioulnar joint. At late follow-up (9.7 years) function was considerably improved. When the ulnar head was correctly relocated during operation, a new distal radioulnar space developed. Shortening of the ulna must be generous and combined with slight flexion at the osteotomy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 09 (05) ◽  
pp. 411-416
Author(s):  
Robert Gvozdenovic ◽  
Michel Boeckstyns ◽  
Søren Merser

Abstract Purpose Various implants have been described for ulnar head replacement (UHR) or for total replacement of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). Many series are small and few reports on mid- or long-term results. This study is primarily aimed to report on the midterm results after ulnar head only and total DRUJ replacement using the uHead in the treatment of painful disorders of the DRUJ. The secondary aim of the study was to eventually assess the combination of UHR and total wrist arthroplasty (TWA). Materials and Methods We included 20 consecutive patients in whom an UHR with the uHead was performed at our institution between February 2005 and March 2017. There were 6 men and 14 women with mean age of 59 years (range: 36–80 years). The mean follow-up time was 5 years (range: 2–15 years). Data were recorded prospectively before operation and at follow-up examinations and entered in a registry. The patients were followed-up at 3 and 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and thereafter annually. In five cases, the uHead was implanted simultaneously with a Remotion TWA. In four cases, a Remotion TWA had been implanted previously. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to estimate the cumulative probability of remaining free of revision. A nonparametric Wilcoxon's signed-rank test was used for comparing data not normally distributed (qDASH [quick disabilities of the hand, shoulder, and arm] scores), and the paired parametric Student's t-test was used for normally distributed data (pain and visual analogue scale [VAS] scores, range of motion, and grip strength). Significance was set at a p-value of less than 0.05. Results Pain, grip strength, and the function improved significantly. Pain after surgery decreased with 50 points on the VAS score scale of 100, from 66 (mean), preoperatively (range: 16–97) to 16 (mean; range: 0–51), postoperatively, while grip strength nearly doubled from 12 KgF (mean; range: 4–22), before to 21 KgF (mean; range: 6–36), after the surgery. Patients function measured with qDASH scores improved from 56 (mean; range: 36–75), preoperatively to 19 (mean; range: 4–47), postoperatively. Wrist extension, flexion, and ulnar and radial deviation did not change to a clinically or statistically significant extend, neither did supination nor pronation improved after surgery. While three UHRs were revised early because of pain problems and/or unsatisfactory forearm rotation in two cases and infection in one, 17 had an uncomplicated postoperative course and these patients were satisfied with the results of the surgery at all the follow-ups. Due to limited number of cases, the calculation of significance in comparing combined cases with UHR only cases was abandoned. Conclusion Ulnar head arthroplasty (uHead) showed significant improvement in pain, grip strength, and the function of the patients with a painful disability of the DRUJ, without impairment on mobility on the midterm follow-up. The overall implant survival over the time and the complication rate was acceptable.


2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. A. LAURENTIN-PÉREZ ◽  
A. N. GOODWIN ◽  
B. A. BABB ◽  
L. R. SCHEKER

This paper reports a long-term follow-up measuring pain, range of motion and weight-bearing ability, following implantation of a total distal radioulnar joint prosthesis. This prosthesis differs from excision arthroplasties and ulnar head replacements by replacing all three components of the distal radioulnar joint, viz. the sigmoid notch, the ulnar head and the triangular fibrocartilage. The design allows longitudinal migration of the radius throughout pronation and supination, as well as load bearing of the wrist. Thirty-one patients receiving the prosthesis returned or were interviewed by telephone at a mean of 5.9 (range 4–9) years. Pronation increased from a mean of 65.5° (range 5–90°) to 74° (range 20–90°) and supination from 53° (range 5–90°) to 70° (range 20–90°) while greatly diminishing and/or eliminating pain. Grip increased from a mean of 10 kg (22 lbs) to 24 kg (52 lbs). Weight bearing was restored or increased in 29 of 31 patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document