Percutaneous Balloon Pericardiotomy for Patients With Recurrent Pericardial Effusion: Using a Novel Double-Balloon Technique With One Long and One Short Balloon

1997 ◽  
Vol 80 (12) ◽  
pp. 1635-1637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwan-Lih Hsu ◽  
Chang-Her Tsai ◽  
Fu-Tien Chiang ◽  
Huey-Ming Lo ◽  
Chuen-Den Tseng ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Raed Aqel ◽  
Muawiyah Elqadi ◽  
Ahmad Hammouri ◽  
Mohammad S. Alqadi

Background. A Percutaneous Balloon Pericardiotomy (PBP) procedure is a reemerging nonsurgical technique that helps in preventing the reaccumulation of pericardial effusion. It is done percutaneously without general anaesthesia. It has been proved to be effective in alleviating and preventing recurrent pericardial effusion. Case Presentation. We reported a 52-year-old male with stage IV adenocarcinoma causing recurrent pericardial effusion. The patient experienced a worsening shortness of breath. A surgical pericardial window was denied by the surgery team secondary to severe respiratory distress; subsequently, the patient underwent Percutaneous Balloon Pericardiotomy. Conclusion. Percutaneous Balloon Pericardiotomy is efficacious and safe when done by well-trained physicians. We think it should be considered as a preferred treatment modality in most sicker patients with recurrent pericardial effusion.


Heart ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Al Kasab ◽  
P Ribeiro ◽  
M Al Zaibag

1995 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Iaffaldano ◽  
Paul Jones ◽  
Bruce E. Lewis ◽  
Elias G. Eleftheriades ◽  
Sarah A. Johnson ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Yildirim ◽  
Recep Ustaalioglu ◽  
Murat Erkan ◽  
Bala Basak Oven Ustaalioglu ◽  
Hatice Demirbag ◽  
...  

<strong>Background:</strong> Patients with recurrent pericardial effusion and pericardial tamponade are usually treated in thoracic surgery clinics by VATS (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) or open pericardial window operation. The diagnostic importance of pathological evaluation of the pericardial fluid and tissue in the same patients has been reported in few studies. We reviewed pathological examination of the pericardial tissue and fluid specimens and the effect on the clinical treatment in our clinic, and compared the results with the literature. <br /><strong>Methods:</strong> We retrospectively analyzed 174 patients who underwent pericardial window operation due to pericardial tamponade or recurrent pericardial effusion. For all patients both the results of the pericardial fluid and pericardial biopsy specimen were evaluated. Clinicopathological factors were analyzed by using descriptive analysis. <br /><strong>Results:</strong> Median age was 61 (range, 20-94 years). The most common benign diagnosis was chronic inflammation (94 patients) by pericardial biopsy. History of malignancy was present in 28 patients (16.1%) and the most common disease was lung cancer (14 patients). A total of 24 patients (13.8%) could be diagnosed as having malignancy by pericardial fluid or pericardial biopsy examination. The malignancy was recognized for 12 patients who had a history of cancer; 9 of 12 with pericardial biopsy, 7 diagnosed by pericardial fluid. Twelve of 156 patients were recognized as having underlying malignancy by pericardial biopsy (n = 9) or fluid examination (n = 10), without known malignancy previously. <br /><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Recurrent pericardial effusion/pericardial tamponade are entities frequently diagnosed, and surgical interventions may be needed either for diagnosis and/or treatment, but specific etiology can rarely be obtained in spite of pathological examination of either pericardial tissue or fluid. For increasing the probability of a specific diagnosis both the pericardial fluid and the pericardial tissues have to be sent for pathologic examination.


EP Europace ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Nakanishi ◽  
K. Kashiwase ◽  
M. Nishio ◽  
M. Wada ◽  
A. Hirata ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yin Niu ◽  
Lin Li ◽  
Jun Tang ◽  
Gang Zhu ◽  
Zhi Chen

Multiple endovascular management of direct carotid cavernous fistula (CCF) has been widely accepted as a treatment option. Embolization of the fistula with detachable balloons or thrombogenic coil-based occlusion has been the main choice to treat direct CCF, with good safety and efficacy. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of embolization of direct CCF with the novel double-balloon technique. A retrospective review of a prospective database on cerebral vascular disease was performed. We identified a total of five patients presenting with high-flow direct CCF. All patients were managed with transarterial embolization with the novel double-balloon technique. Three of the five patients were treated with two detachable balloons, and a completely occluded fistula with preservation of the internal carotid artery was achieved. Of the remaining two patients treated with more detachable balloons, one patient achieved a perfect outcome and the other one suffered from recurrent fistula due to balloon migration 3 weeks after embolization. During a follow-up period of 12–18 months, no symptoms reoccurred in any patient. Thus, the double-balloon treatment may be a promising method for CCF complete occlusion. This novel technique may bring more benefits in the following two cases: 1). A single inflated detachable balloon fails to completely occlude the CCF, which causing the next balloon can not pass into the fistula. 2). A giant CCF needs more balloons for fistula embolization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document