A clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in postterm pregnancy

1994 ◽  
Vol 170 (3) ◽  
pp. 716-723 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Induction Of Labor ◽  
Postterm Pregnancy

Clinical Trial of Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management in Twin Pregnancy

2000 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shunji Suzuki ◽  
Yasuo Otsubo ◽  
Rintaro Sawa ◽  
Yoshio Yoneyama ◽  
Tsutomu Araki
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Twin Pregnancy ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Induction Of Labor

Comparison of elective induction of labor with favorable Bishop scores versus expectant management: A randomized clinical trial

2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E Nielsen ◽  
Bobby C Howard ◽  
Christina C Hill ◽  
Penny L Larson ◽  
Robert HB Holland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Induction Of Labor ◽  
Elective Induction

scholarly journals 757 Outcomes of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared to expectant management by age

2021 ◽  
Vol 224 (2) ◽  
pp. S474
Author(s):  
Alyssa R. Hersh ◽  
Eleanor M. Schmidt ◽  
Claire H. Packer ◽  
Bharti Garg ◽  
Aaron B. Caughey
Keyword(s):  
Expectant Management ◽  
Induction Of Labor ◽  
Elective Induction

Early amniotomy after dinoprostone insert used for the induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 352-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evrim Bostancı ◽  
Ahmet Eser ◽  
Cigdem Yayla Abide ◽  
Cetin Kılıccı ◽  
Mehmet Kucukbas
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Induction Of Labor

12: Induction of labor versus expectant management in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks–the PPROMEXIL-2 trial (ISRCTN05689407)

2012 ◽  
Vol 206 (1) ◽  
pp. S8-S9
Author(s):  
David van der Ham ◽  
Jantien van der Heijden ◽  
Brent Opmeer ◽  
Hans van Beek ◽  
Christine Willekes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Expectant Management ◽  
Induction Of Labor ◽  
Prelabor Rupture Of Membranes

scholarly journals 26: Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks versus expectant management in low-risk multiparous women

2019 ◽  
Vol 220 (1) ◽  
pp. S21-S22
Author(s):  
Rachel G. Sinkey ◽  
Christina T. Blanchard ◽  
Jeff M. Szychowski ◽  
Elizabeth Ausbeck ◽  
Akila Subramaniam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Expectant Management ◽  
Induction Of Labor ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Multiparous Women ◽  
Elective Induction

scholarly journals Outcomes of non-medically indicated induction of labor compared to expectant management by race and ethnicity

2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S544
Author(s):  
Alyssa R. Hersh ◽  
Brooke F. Mischkot ◽  
Bharti Garg ◽  
Megha Arora ◽  
Aaron B. Caughey
Keyword(s):  
Race And Ethnicity ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Induction Of Labor

scholarly journals Bayesian Scepsis About SWEPIS: Quantifying the Evidence That Early Induction of Labour Prevents Perinatal Deaths

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers ◽  
Alexander Ly
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Bayesian Analysis ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Perinatal Deaths ◽  
Management Group ◽  
Induction Group

In a recent randomized clinical trial, Wennerholm and colleagues compared induction of labour at 41 weeks with expectant management and induction at 42 weeks. The trial was stopped early, because six perinatal deaths occurred in the expectant management group, whereas none occurred in the induction group. Our Bayesian reanalysis finds that the SWEPIS data indeed support the hypothesis that induction of labour at 41 weeks of pregnancy is associated with a lower rate of stillbirths. However, the degree of this support is moderate at best, and arguably provides insufficient ground for terminating the study. In general, it seems hazardous to terminate clinical studies on the basis of a single P<0.05 result, without converging support of a Bayesian analysis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document