A Standardized Test Object for Visual Field Studies Electric Illumination

1924 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 854-855 ◽  
Author(s):  
John N. Evans
1964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milton S. Katz ◽  
Paul A. Cirincione ◽  
William Metlay
Keyword(s):  

1952 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 381-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Chamlin ◽  
Leo M. Davidoff

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 731-736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen F. Enloe ◽  
Philip Westra ◽  
Scott J. Nissen ◽  
Stephen D. Miller ◽  
Phillip W. Stahlman

Field studies were conducted in Colorado, Kansas, and Wyoming to compare the use of quinclorac plus 2,4-D with picloram plus 2,4-D, dicamba plus 2,4-D, a glyphosate plus 2,4-D premix, and 2,4-D alone for control of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) in a winter wheat (Triticum aestivum)-fallow rotation. Treatments were applied in late summer or fall each year for two, three, or four consecutive years at the beginning and end of each fallow period. Evaluations were taken 10 to 12 mo after treatment each year. Quinclorac plus 2,4-D and picloram plus 2,4-D consistently performed as well as or better than 2,4-D, dicamba plus 2,4-D, and glyphosate plus 2,4-D. Wheat yields increased when field bindweed was controlled during the fallow period. Strong correlations (r> −0.85) were obtained among visual field bindweed evaluation, biomass, and stand count data.


1960 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. WENDLAND ◽  
S. NERENBERG

1927 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 818
Author(s):  
Ralph I. Lloyd
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document