Preservation of the aortic valve in acute type A dissection complicated by aortic regurgitation

1999 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 2010-2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renzo Pessotto ◽  
Francesco Santini ◽  
Peppino Pugliese ◽  
Giuseppe Montalbano ◽  
Giovanni Battista Luciani ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. e50-e51
Author(s):  
Victoria Contreras ◽  
Roy Sheinbaum ◽  
Stephanie Tran ◽  
John Zaki ◽  
Ovidiu Moise

Surgery Today ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 413-418
Author(s):  
Yukinori Moriyama ◽  
Goichi Yotsumoto ◽  
Hiroshi Masuda ◽  
Yosihumi Iguro ◽  
Shunichi Watanabe ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 111 (2) ◽  
pp. 381-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludwig K. von Segesser ◽  
Enrico Lorenzetti ◽  
Mario Lachat ◽  
Urs Niederhäuser ◽  
Mariette Schönbeck ◽  
...  

Surgery Today ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 413-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukinori Moriyama ◽  
Goichi Yotsumoto ◽  
Hiroshi Masuda ◽  
Yosihumi Iguro ◽  
Shunichi Watanabe ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 106 (12_suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer G. Leyh ◽  
Stefan Fischer ◽  
Klaus Kallenbach ◽  
Theo Kofidis ◽  
Klaus Pethig ◽  
...  

Background Valve-sparing surgery including the replacement of the sinus of valsalvae were initially meant to be promising approaches in the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. However, the long-term outcome after valve-sparing aortic root replacement in acute type A dissection is currently the subject of intense debate, and the evidence reported in the literature is sparse. Here we report on our experience on valve sparing aortic root replacement inpatients with acute type A dissection. Methods From August 1995 to November 2000, 30 patients with acute type A dissection received valve-sparing aortic root replacement. Two different techniques were performed: the “remodeling” technique, first described by Yacoub in 1983 (8 patients) and the “reimplantation” technique, initially described by David and Feindel, in 1992 (22 patients). Endpoints of the study were early and late mortality, as well as aortic valve-related complications and reoperations. Results The mean follow-up time was 22.6±15.4 months. The overall 30 day mortality was 17% (5/29) and the late mortality 4% (1/24). During the observation period, 4 patients had to be reoperated (n=3) for acute aortic valve regurgitation after aortic root remodeling and for acute aortic valve endocarditis (n=1) after aortic root reimplantation. In the 3 patients with acute aortic valve regurgitation, symptoms occurred 44, 24, and 17 months after the initial operation in these patients. Intraoperatively prolapsing aortic leaflets because of commissural detachment was found in all 3 cases. In all other patients the latest echocardiographic follow-up examination revealed freedom from aortic regugitation higher than grade 1. Conclusions The high failure rate of aortic root remodeling inpatients with acute type A aortic dissection is discouraging. Whether this technique should be applied in acute type A aortic dissection is questionable. In contrast, aortic root reimplantation lead to favorable midterm outcome. Thus, we recommend consideration of this technique for surgical treatment of patients with acute type A aortic dissection.


1997 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 1108-1112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Westaby ◽  
Takahiro Katsumata ◽  
Edward Freitas

Author(s):  
Kartik Patel ◽  
Archit Patel ◽  
Chandrasekaran Ananthanarayanan

Concomitant presence of acute type A dissection and coactation of aorta is rare (1). Levoatriocardinal vein has shown to be associated with left sided hypoplastic lesions as well as with normal hearts (2, 3 ). However, concurrent presence of levoatriocardinal vein with acute type A dissection, severe aortic regurgitation and Coarctation of aortic isthmus was not described. We here described a case of 20 year male presented to emergency department with acute chest pain radiating to back. On evaluation, he was found to have acute type A dissection with dilated aortic root, severe aortic regurgitation, normal mitral valve, severe coarctation of aorta and levoatriocardinal vein. Patient was managed successfully with composite valve conduit replacement of ascending aorta with ascending aortic to descending aortic graft (16mm graft) with levoatriocardinal vein ligation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 58 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Kobuch ◽  
S Hirt ◽  
L Rupprecht ◽  
M Hilker ◽  
C Schmid

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document