scholarly journals Mental Programming After Frontal Lobe Lesions: Results on Digit Symbol Performance with Self-Selected Goals

Cortex ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juhani Vilkki ◽  
Peter Holst
1995 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur P. Shimamura ◽  
Paul J. Jurica ◽  
Jennifer A. Mangels ◽  
Felick B. Gershberg ◽  
Robert T. Knight

Patients with frontal lobe lesions were adminstered tests of paired-associate learning in which cue and response words are manipulated to increase interference across two study lists. In one test of paired-associate learning (AB-AC test), cue words used in one list are repeated in a second list but are associated with different response words (e.g., LION-HUNTER, LION-CIRCUS). In another test (AB-ABr test), words used in one list are repeated in a second list but are rearranged to form new pairs. Compared to control subjects, patients with frontal lobe lesions exhibited disproportionate impairment of second-list learning as a result of interference effects. In particular, patients exhibited the poorest performance during the initial trial of the second list, a trial in which interference effects from the first list would be most apparent. These findings suggest that the on-line control of irrelevant or competing memory associations is disrupted following frontal lobe lesions. This disruption may be indicative of an impaired gating or filtering mechanism that affects not only memory function but other cognitive function as well.


1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 298-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juhani Vilkki ◽  
Outi Surma-aho ◽  
Antti Servo

1988 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 555-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Leonard ◽  
L. Jones ◽  
B. Milner

QJM ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 94 (8) ◽  
pp. 449-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.L. Manoj

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 586-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
JULIANA V. BALDO ◽  
ARTHUR P. SHIMAMURA ◽  
DEAN C. DELIS ◽  
JOEL KRAMER ◽  
EDITH KAPLAN

The ability to generate items belonging to categories in verbal fluency tasks has been attributed to frontal cortex. Nonverbal fluency (e.g., design fluency) has been assessed separately and found to rely on the right hemisphere or right frontal cortex. The current study assessed both verbal and nonverbal fluency in a single group of patients with focal, frontal lobe lesions and age- and education-matched control participants. In the verbal fluency task, participants generated items belonging to both letter cues (F, A, and S) and category cues (animals and boys' names). In the design fluency task, participants generated novel designs by connecting dot arrays with 4 straight lines. A switching condition was included in both verbal and design fluency tasks and required participants to switch back and forth between different sets (e.g., between naming fruits and furniture). As a group, patients with frontal lobe lesions were impaired, compared to control participants, on both verbal and design fluency tasks. Patients with left frontal lesions performed worse than patients with right frontal lesions on the verbal fluency task, but the 2 groups performed comparably on the design fluency task. Both patients and control participants were impacted similarly by the switching conditions. These results suggest that verbal fluency is more dependent on left frontal cortex, while nonverbal fluency tasks, such as design fluency, recruit both right and left frontal processes. (JINS, 2001, 7, 586–596.)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document