scholarly journals State-dependent learning (dissociation of learning). III. State-dependent learning with hallucinogens in rats

1974 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Katsushi Yamada ◽  
Nobuya Ogawa ◽  
Showa Ueki
1973 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Katsushi Yamada ◽  
Nobuya Ogava ◽  
Yutaka Gomita ◽  
Michihiro Fujiwara ◽  
Showa Ueki

2020 ◽  
Vol 163 ◽  
pp. 33-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire T. Hemingway ◽  
Michael J. Ryan ◽  
Rachel A. Page

SLEEP ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 1669-1679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla L. Patti ◽  
Karina A. Zanin ◽  
Leandro Sanday ◽  
Sonia R. Kameda ◽  
Luciano Fernandes-Santos ◽  
...  

1976 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Pusakulich ◽  
Harold C. Nielson

1983 ◽  
Vol 143 (5) ◽  
pp. 480-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Millar

SummaryWhen subjects act as their own controls in drug experiments there is a risk of asymmetrical transfer between treatment conditions, with the result that treatment effects are determined largely by order of administration. In such cases the effect of a drug may be reduced or exaggerated, and prior treatment with a drug may affect placebo conditions. Asymmetrical transfer is probably much more common than is generally realized. Suggested causes include inadequate wash-out between treatments, state-dependent learning, adoption of learning strategies, and practice effects. The problem is illustrated by the re-analysis of a paper on the effects of benzhexol on memory, published recently in this journal (Potamianos and Kellet, 1982). The advantages of separate-group experimental design are reconsidered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document