Abstract
Primary Subject area
Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine
Background
Mechanical ventilation is frequently used in preterm infants for various indications, but is associated with multiple complications, including bronchopulmonary dysplasia and poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes. Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) is a noninvasive ventilation (NIV) strategy used to avoid mechanical ventilation and associated complications. However, its effectiveness remains controversial, and its safety has not been established.
Objectives
The objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness of nHFOV to prevent intubations and support adequate ventilation in preterm infants, and to assess its safety profile.
Design/Methods
This was a retrospective crossover case study including 24 infants and 30 nHFOV instances between May 2018 and June 2020. Infants were included if they were placed on nHFOV for at least one hour; each nHFOV trial contributed as one instance. Data was collected from health records. Effectiveness outcomes were: successful transition to another NIV mode without requiring intubation, and variations in CO2, FiO2, and number of spells. Safety outcomes were: apparition of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), gastrointestinal complications, nasal cutaneous trauma, and comfort as assessed with the Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale (N-PASS). Descriptive statistics were used for baseline characteristics. Nonparametric and semiparametric tests were used to compare outcomes pre- and during nHFOV.
Results
Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. At initiation of nHFOV, mean chronological age and weight were 24 days (95% CI: 20 – 28) and 1119 grams (95% CI: 1038 – 1200) respectively. The most frequent indication for nHFOV was spells (56.7%), and the mean duration of nHFOV instances was 3.9 days (95% CI: 2.7 – 5.1) (Table 1). In 18 (60%) cases, infants transitioned successfully to another NIV mode without requiring intubation. Levels of CO2 and number of spells were significantly lower during nHFOV than pre-nHFOV. There was no significant difference in FiO2 pre-nHFOV and during nHFOV. No apparition or progression of IVH was observed following the use of nHFOV. There was no significant difference in N-PASS, nasal trauma, and gastrointestinal complications pre-nHFOV and during nHFOV (Table 2).
Conclusion
This study suggests that nHFOV is an effective ventilation method to avoid intubation and to decrease spells in preterm infants, without increasing complications.
Effect of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation combined with volume guarantee on preterm infants with hypoxic respiratory failure
