1401: Long-Term Functional and Oncological Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Sural Nerve Interposition Grafting during Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 461-461
Author(s):  
Kevin C. Zorn ◽  
Ofer N. Gofrit ◽  
Albert A. Mikhail ◽  
David H. Song ◽  
Marcelo A. Orvieto ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 1005-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin C. Zorn ◽  
Andrew J. Bernstein ◽  
Ofer N. Gofrit ◽  
Sergey A. Shikanov ◽  
Albert A. Mikhail ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 111 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel Hruza ◽  
Justo Lorenzo Bermejo ◽  
Bettina Flinspach ◽  
Michael Schulze ◽  
Dogu Teber ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 278
Author(s):  
M. Hruza ◽  
B. Flinsbach ◽  
C. Stock ◽  
D. Teber ◽  
J. Rassweiler

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 2589-2061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lester S. Borden Jr. ◽  
Paul M. Kozlowski

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP) has become an accepted treatment option for men with prostate cancer. A search of the available literature through January 2006 was performed to analyze the surgical technique, outcomes data, and other unique issues regarding RLRP. While prospective, randomized trials and long-term data are lacking, short-term data from single institution series have demonstrated outcomes for RLRP that appear to be equivalent to those for open radical prostatectomy (ORP). Although not yet proven, some encouraging data suggest that RLRP may be able to achieve improved cancer control, postoperative urinary control, and erectile function compared to open surgery for prostate cancer. Definite advantages of RLRP over ORP are not yet established. Future studies will determine the role of RLRP in the surgical treatment of men with prostate cancer.


2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 452-452
Author(s):  
Albert A. Mikhail ◽  
David H. Song ◽  
Marcelo A. Orvieto ◽  
Benjamin R. Stockton ◽  
Edward M. Gong ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 183 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel Hruza ◽  
Michael Schulze ◽  
Dogu Teber ◽  
Jens Rassweiler

2020 ◽  
pp. 039156032097985
Author(s):  
Fanourios Georgiades ◽  
Kostas Konstantinou ◽  
Chryssanthos Kouriefs

Introduction: Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) following endoscopic resection of the prostate is known to be feasible with good outcomes. However, the literature evidence is limited on the feasibility and outcomes of RALRP following open prostatic surgery. In this study, our aim was to report our experience with RALRP in patients who had undergone trans-vesical adenomectomy of the prostate in the past. Patients and methods: We reviewed our prospectively maintained database of men treated with RALRP at our institution to identify patients with previous history of open suprapubic trans-vesical adenomectomy, between 2016 and 2020. Data were collected on demographic information, interventions, oncological outcomes and follow-up. Results: Out of 362 patients, four individuals were identified that had previous open suprapubic trans-vesical adenomectomy. The mean age was 71 years with a mean pre-operative prostate specific antigen (PSA) of 11.35 ng/ml, and an average of 10 years after their trans-vesical adenomectomy. The mean console time was 119 min with an average estimated blood loss of 137.5 ml and 75% underwent lymphadenectomy. Post-operatively, all patients were discharged after 1 day with their urinary catheters removed at 7 days post-op. For one of the patients, a urine leak was identified, and his pelvic drain was removed at 5 days instead of 1 day as for the other three patients. No other complications were noted within 30 days. The average prostate weight was 54.7 g with all specimens being T3a R0. At 6 weeks follow-up, PSA was undetectable, three patients reported full continence and 1 was using two pads/day. Conclusion: RALRP following previous open trans-vesical prostatectomy is feasible and safe with excellent oncological outcomes. They are, however, more challenging and cumbersome with increased console time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document