Lupus Biologic Drug Pipeline: An Embarrassment of Riches

2008 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
BRUCE JANCIN
Keyword(s):  
2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (16) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
BRUCE JANCIN
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 840-841
Author(s):  
Laura DeFrancesco
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Ozge Yilmaz Topal ◽  
Volkan Kose ◽  
Banu Acar ◽  
Umut Selda Bayrakci ◽  
Derya Ozyoruk ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Biological drugs are currently used for the treatment of chronic inflammatory, autoimmune, and neoplastic diseases. With their expanding indication spectrum and increasing use, hypersensitivity reactions to these drugs are also becoming more frequent. The present study aimed to report the incidence and the features of such reactions in pediatric patients using biologicals for the treatment of various diseases. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The medical records of pediatric patients treated with biological agents between October 1, 2011 and August 31, 2019 were reviewed and adverse reactions were evaluated retrospectively. <b><i>Results:</i></b> During the study period, 211 patients (116 boys, 55%) used 21 different biological drugs for the treatment of various diseases. Their median age at the time of the first treatment was 139.9 (IQR: 92.2–187.8) months. Hematologic-oncologic diseases were the most common indication for biological therapy (97/211; 46.0%), followed by rheumatologic diseases (82/211; 38.9%). Of the 211 patients, 14 (6.64%) experienced reactions to biological drugs. The most common culprit agent was rituximab (57.1%). Most of the patients (85.7%) had a history of reactions either during the infusion or within 1 h after taking the drug. Five patients underwent desensitization to the culprit drug, while 7 other patients continued treatment with a reduced dose/infusion rate or premedication. Also 1 patient continued to take the drug without any additional treatment. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> It was reported that 6.64% of the patients who received biologic drug therapy for various reasons in our hospital had hypersensitivity. The most common culprit agent was rituximab, and most of the reactions were immediate reactions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 13-13
Author(s):  
Michael McCoy
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-125
Author(s):  
Laura DeFrancesco
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura DeFrancesco
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnes Victoria Klein ◽  
Jian Wang ◽  
Brian G. Feagan ◽  
Mark Omoto

On May 12, 2017, various issues and challenges associated with biologics were discussed during a session of the annual joint conference of Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences and Canadian Chapter of Controlled Release Society at Hyatt Regency Hotel, Montréal, QC, Canada.  An update on the Canadian regulatory guidelines for biosimilars was given, followed by viewpoints expressed by regulatory, academic and industry scientists.  Topics of discussion included: reference biologic drug, clinical considerations, immunogenicity, extrapolation and clarification of terminology, product monograph, international collaboration, switching and interchangeability, naming conventions, clinical and non-clinical evaluation, authorization of indications, statistical equivalence, the nor-switch study and biologics marketplace.


2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (10) ◽  
pp. 877-894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan C. Cox ◽  
Laura M. Reese ◽  
Lissett R. Bickford ◽  
Scott S. Verbridge

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document