231 oral Localized prostate cancer: watchful waiting vs. definitive therapy based on psa doubling time, the change in histologic grade on rebiopsy, and the extent of clinical progression

2001 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. S66-S67
2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 215-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Urs E. Studer ◽  
Laurence Collette ◽  
Peter Whelan ◽  
Walter Albrecht ◽  
Jacques Casselman ◽  
...  

Urology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 652-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J Stephenson ◽  
Armen G Aprikian ◽  
Luis Souhami ◽  
Hassan Behlouli ◽  
Avrum I Jacobson ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 389-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel E. Soto ◽  
Rebecca R. Andridge ◽  
Charlie C. Pan ◽  
Scott G. Williams ◽  
Jeremy M.G. Taylor ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 103 (7) ◽  
pp. 872-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael K. Ng ◽  
Nicholas Van As ◽  
Karen Thomas ◽  
Ruth Woode-Amissah ◽  
Alan Horwich ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 576-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven G. Roberts ◽  
Michael L. Blute ◽  
Erik J. Bergstralh ◽  
Jeffrey M. Slezak ◽  
Horst Zincke

2001 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 576-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven G. Roberts ◽  
Michael L. Blute ◽  
Erik J. Bergstralh ◽  
Jeffrey M. Slezak ◽  
Horst Zincke

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14651-14651
Author(s):  
Y. Kakehi ◽  
T. Kamoto ◽  
O. Ogawa ◽  
K. Tobisu ◽  
Y. Saito ◽  
...  

14651 Background: “Watchful waiting (WW)” is becoming a common treatment option for patients (pts) with screening detected prostate cancer. There is, however, no consensus about which pts are suitable for WW and how pts are monitored. Methods: Eligibility criteria: 1) stage T1c prostate cancer pts, 2) age 50–80, 3) serum PSA: 20 ng/ml or less, 4) 1 or 2 positive cores per 6 to 12 systematic core biopsies, 5) Gleason score of 6 or less, 6) 50% or less maximum % cancer occupation in a positive core. The criteria of 4), 5), 6) were confirmed by a central pathologist before pts registration. Registered patients chose either WW or immediate aggressive treatment. In patients who chose WW, serum PSA was monitored every 2 months for 6 months and PSA-doubling time (PSADT) was calculated centrally. Those who showed PSADT 2y and re-biopsy at 13 months fit the initial pathology criteria again. Primary endpoint was “% PSADT > 2 y”, which was defined as proportion of patients who showed PSADT at 6 months > 2 y out of all patients who chose WW. Point estimate of “% PSADT > 2 y” was expected to be higher than 80%. The planned sample size was 100 pts who chose WW, which gives the width of 95% confidence intervals for % PSADT > 2 y within 10%. Results: 134 pts were enrolled from 01/2002 to 12/2003 and 118 pts chose WW while 13 pts chose aggressive treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, hormonal therapy). The initial 6 months’ PSADT could be assessed in 106 patients (measurement point error in 6, early dropout in 6). Of 106 patients, 22 showed PSADT < 2 y (“rapid riser”) while 84 showed PSADT > 2 y. “% PSADT > 2 y” was 71.2% (84/118, 95% CI: 62.1–79.2%). 84 pts have continued WW with median follow-up of 27 months. Neither metastasis nor cancer-death was observed until 06/2005. As to health-related QOL, any domain of SF-36 was not impaired in patients who continued WW at least for 1 year. Conclusion: Our initial selection criteria for WW may include at least 20% of “rapid riser”, hence need further modification. Additionally, it should be confirmed by further follow-up of 84 pts whether eliminating “rapid riser” from WW by initial 6 months’ PSADT is appropriate. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 126-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Klotz ◽  
Liying Zhang ◽  
Adam Lam ◽  
Robert Nam ◽  
Alexandre Mamedov ◽  
...  

Purpose We assessed the outcome of a watchful-waiting protocol with selective delayed intervention by using clinical prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or histologic progression as treatment indications for clinically localized prostate cancer. Patients and Methods This was a prospective, single-arm, cohort study. Patients were managed with an initial expectant approach. Definitive intervention was offered to those patients with a PSA doubling time of less than 3 years, Gleason score progression (to 4 + 3 or greater), or unequivocal clinical progression. Survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard model were applied to the data. Results A total of 450 patients have been observed with active surveillance. Median follow-up was 6.8 years (range, 1 to 13 years). Overall survival was 78.6%. The 10-year prostate cancer actuarial survival was 97.2%. Overall, 30% of patients have been reclassified as higher risk and have been offered definitive therapy. Of 117 patients treated radically, the PSA failure rate was 50%, which was 13% of the total cohort. PSA doubling time of 3 years or less was associated with an 8.5-times higher risk of biochemical failure after definitive treatment compared with a doubling time of more than 3 years (P < .0001). The hazard ratio for nonprostate cancer to prostate cancer mortality was 18.6 at 10 years. Conclusion We observed a low rate of prostate cancer mortality. Among the patients who were reclassified as higher risk and who were treated, PSA failure was relatively common. Other-cause mortality accounted for almost all of the deaths. Additional studies are warranted to improve the identification of patients who harbor more aggressive disease despite favorable clinical parameters at diagnosis.


Urology ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 323-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip L Ross ◽  
Salaheddin Mahmud ◽  
Andrew J Stephenson ◽  
Luis Souhami ◽  
Simon Tanguay ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document