PO-1838 Dosimetric impact of the introduction of biological optimization objectives gEUD and RapidPlan

2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. S1567-S1568
Author(s):  
J. Perez-Alija ◽  
P. Gallego ◽  
M. Barceló ◽  
C. Ansón ◽  
J. Chimeno ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. S1566-S1567
Author(s):  
H. Henjum ◽  
T. Johnsen Dahle ◽  
C. Stokkevåg ◽  
C. Grindeland ◽  
K. Røe Redalen ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 83 (9) ◽  
pp. 748-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry J. Leese ◽  
Fabrice Guerif ◽  
Victoria Allgar ◽  
Daniel R. Brison ◽  
Kersti Lundin ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 6248-6257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah C. Brüningk ◽  
Florian Kamp ◽  
Jan J. Wilkens

Paleobiology ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
George R. McGhee

Using a geometric model of shell morphology, it is demonstrated that biconvex brachiopods occupy only a small region of the potential geometric space available to organisms with planispiral exoskeletons composed of two articulated valves. Measurements taken for a sample of 324 genera of the articulate orders Pentamerida, Rhynchonellida, Spiriferida, and Terebratulida were analyzed using a simple geometric model of shell form and ontogeny. The frequency distribution of brachiopod shell morphologies exhibited by the four orders represents the biological optimization of the spatial relationships between area and volume. Biconvex brachiopods develop shells which are designed to minimize shell surface area while maximizing internal shell volume. The means by which optimization is achieved is related directly to the effects of increase in absolute size during ontogeny. The boundaries upon shell geometries utilizable by biconvex brachiopods are determined by (1) limitations of articulation, and (2) limitations of surface and volume.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document