Radiosurgery for brain oligometastases in lung cancer

INTRODUCTION Brain metastases are a common problem in oncology patients, especially in lung cancer. The usual treatment for cerebral oligometastases is whole brain radiation therapy. Given the persistent poor prognosis of this disease, other therapeutic alternatives such as stereotactic radiosurgery have been considered. However, there is no clarity regarding the effectiveness of its addition. METHODS We searched in Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS We identified 17 systematic reviews including seven studies overall, of which four were randomized trials. All trials assessed patients with brain oligometastases, but none of them included exclusively lung cancer population. We concluded that it is not possible to clearly establish whether radiosurgery decreases neurological functionality, cognitive impairment, mortality or serious adverse effects, as the certainty of the existing evidence has been assessed as very low.

Treatment for Brain Metastases: ASCO-SNO-ASTRO Guideline

Purpose To provide guidance to clinicians regarding therapy for patients with brain metastases from solid tumors. Methods ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. Results Thirty-two randomized trials published in 2008 or later met eligibility criteria and form the primary evidentiary base. Recommendations Surgery is a reasonable option for patients with brain metastases. Patients with large tumors with mass effect are more likely to benefit than those with multiple brain metastases and/or uncontrolled systemic disease. Patients with symptomatic brain metastases should receive local therapy regardless of the systemic therapy used. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases, local therapy should not be deferred unless deferral is specifically recommended in this guideline. The decision to defer local therapy should be based on a multidisciplinary discussion of the potential benefits and harms that the patient may experience. Several regimens were recommended for non–small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases and no systemic therapy options, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone should be offered to patients with one to four unresected brain metastases, excluding small-cell lung carcinoma. SRS alone to the surgical cavity should be offered to patients with one to two resected brain metastases. SRS, whole brain radiation therapy, or their combination are reasonable options for other patients. Memantine and hippocampal avoidance should be offered to patients who receive whole brain radiation therapy and have no hippocampal lesions and 4 months or more expected survival. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases with either Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 50 or Karnofsky Performance Status < 70 with no systemic therapy options do not derive benefit from radiation therapy. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines.

Treatment for Brain Metastases: ASCO-SNO-ASTRO Guideline

PURPOSE To provide guidance to clinicians regarding therapy for patients with brain metastases from solid tumors. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. RESULTS Thirty-two randomized trials published in 2008 or later met eligibility criteria and form the primary evidentiary base. RECOMMENDATIONS Surgery is a reasonable option for patients with brain metastases. Patients with large tumors with mass effect are more likely to benefit than those with multiple brain metastases and/or uncontrolled systemic disease. Patients with symptomatic brain metastases should receive local therapy regardless of the systemic therapy used. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases, local therapy should not be deferred unless deferral is specifically recommended in this guideline. The decision to defer local therapy should be based on a multidisciplinary discussion of the potential benefits and harms that the patient may experience. Several regimens were recommended for non–small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases and no systemic therapy options, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone should be offered to patients with one to four unresected brain metastases, excluding small-cell lung carcinoma. SRS alone to the surgical cavity should be offered to patients with one to two resected brain metastases. SRS, whole brain radiation therapy, or their combination are reasonable options for other patients. Memantine and hippocampal avoidance should be offered to patients who receive whole brain radiation therapy and have no hippocampal lesions and 4 months or more expected survival. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases with either Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 50 or Karnofsky Performance Status < 70 with no systemic therapy options do not derive benefit from radiation therapy. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines .

Brain Metastases from Adult Sarcomas: A Retrospective Cohort Study from the Hellenic Group of Sarcomas and Rare Cancers (HGSRC)

Brain metastases are rare events in patients with sarcoma and the available information is relatively limited. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with sarcoma who developed brain metastases between April 2010 and April 2020 in six centers. Thirty-four adult patients were included with a median age at brain metastases diagnosis of 55.5 years (range, 18–75). The primary sarcomas originated either from soft tissue (n = 27) or bone (n = 7) and the most common subtypes were leiomyosarcoma (n = 8), Ewing sarcoma/peripheral neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) (n = 7) and osteosarcoma (n = 3). Most primary tumors were of high grade and located mainly in the extremities (n = 18). The vast majority of patients at the time of brain metastasis diagnosis already had extracranial metastatic disease (n = 26). The median time from sarcoma diagnosis to cerebral metastasis diagnosis was 16 months (range, 1–136). Treatment modalities for brain metastatic disease included whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) (n = 22), chemotherapy (n = 17), exclusive palliative care (n = 5), surgery (n = 9), targeted therapy (n = 6) or stereotactic radiosurgery (n = 2). Most patients experienced a progression of brain metastases (n = 11). The median overall survival from brain metastasis diagnosis was 3 months (range, 0–80). OS was significantly influenced by time-to-brain metastases (p = 0.041), WBRT (p = 0.018), surgery (p = 0.002) and chemotherapy (p = 0.006). In a multivariate analysis, only the localization of the primary (p = 0.047) and WBRT (p = 0.038) were associated with survival with statistical significance. Patients with sarcoma brain metastases have a particularly poor prognosis and an appropriate therapeutic approach is yet to be defined.

SMART Syndrome (Stroke-like migraine attacks after radiation therapy): When to suspect it?

Background: Stroke-like migraine attacks after radiation therapy (SMART) syndrome is a benign complication of brain radiation therapy, which presents circa a decade after radiation treatment. Symptoms are stroke-like deficits, epileptic seizures, and migraine. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging is characteristic for alterations in the form of unilateral cortical hyperintensities and gyriform enhancement, most prominent in the parieto-occipital regions. Prompt diagnosis is essential to avoid unnecessary investigations (e.g., brain biopsy and angiography). Case Description: We describe a 51-year-old female patient treated initially with cranial irradiation for a left-sided occipital metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Five years later, she presented with migraine headache, aphasia, and a right sided hemiparesis. Conclusion: The triad of migraine, seizure, and hemiparesis within the context of a prior brain radiotherapy should promptly raise the suspicion of SMART syndrome. Prompt diagnosis is essential to avoid unnecessary invasive investigations.

Report of A Case of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Following Intracranial Germinoma

Introduction The occurrence of second primary thyroid malignancy should be noticed in survivors of brain germinoma treated by irradiation. Case Report A patient with a history of intracranial germinoma who underwent chemoradiotherapy was referred to our endocrine clinic due to impotency and infertility. The patient received replacement therapy due to hypopituitarism. He returned to us 11 years after brain radiation with enlargement of the thyroid gland. Thyroid ultrasonography showed enlargement with a dominant 62*37 mm solid hypoechoic nodule in the right thyroid lobe. Several lymph nodes at both sides of the neck were seen. Total thyroidectomy revealed PTC with regional metastasis. Conclusion Endocrine disruption must be considered in adult cancer survivors and the importance of long-term follow-up should be emphasized in these patients.

INNV-32. ACCESS TO SPECIALTY RADIATION CARE FOR PATIENTS WITH RESECTABLE BRAIN TUMORS

INTRODUCTION Many patients with brain tumors face challenges with access to care. For rural patients, prolonged travel times may limit access to appropriate radiotherapy. Radiation centers (RCs) offering specialized brain radiotherapy, e.g., stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), are geographically limited. Brain brachytherapy at the time of resection offers an option for such patients, but technical challenges have limited the adoption. To address the limitations of traditional brachytherapy, a device with Cs-131 seeds embedded in a bioresorbable collagen tile (GammaTile (GT), GT Medical Technologies, Tempe, AZ) was developed. The device is FDA-cleared for permanent implantation at the time of resection for all recurrent intracranial tumors and newly diagnosed malignant intracranial neoplasms. To investigate if wider availability of this treatment could possibly lower the geographic barrier to access to care, we mapped the US population against existing RCs with brain tumor expertise and neurosurgery centers (NSCs) performing craniotomies. METHODS We analyzed 2018 CMS claims data using CPT codes for single- and multi-fraction SRS to identify RCs with brain tumor treatment expertise and mapped these against the population. Using similar methodology, using CPT codes for craniotomies, we identified NSCs, as any facility performing craniotomies is potentially eligible to implant the device. RESULTS 135 RCs used CPT codes for SRS. 193-, 119-, 82-, and 52-million Americans lived &gt;30-, &gt;60-, &gt;90-, and &gt;120-minutes from one of these centers, respectively. 530 NSCs preform craniotomies, including ≥ 1 in every state, a 4-fold increase over the number of RCs offering SRS. CONCLUSIONS For many patients, substantial travel distances limit access to RCs with brain tumor treatment expertise. In contrast, the 530 craniotomy-performing NSCs have far greater geographic dispersion. The option of undergoing brain radiation with GT implantation at the time of brain tumor craniotomy brings treatment closer to millions, ensures compliance, and reduces additional travel for follow-up radiation treatment.