Clinical usefulness of PIVKA-II measured by sensitive enzyme immunoassay and AFP-L3 measured by automated analyzer in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

2001 ◽  
Vol 34 (0) ◽  
pp. 98-99
Author(s):  
Y Paik
2003 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viki Massey, ART ◽  
Zafar Hussain, MD, FRCP(C) ◽  
Daniel B. Gregson, MD, FRCP(C) ◽  
Michael A. John, MBChB, FRCP(C) ◽  
Abdul H. Chagla, PhD ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 83 (12) ◽  
pp. 1366-1372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshikazu Hada ◽  
Yumiko Kinoshita ◽  
Yuzo Ichimori ◽  
Hiroyasu Imanishi ◽  
Keishi Umeyama ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 849-855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Nakamura ◽  
Naoki Ito ◽  
Fumio Kotake ◽  
Yuji Mizokami ◽  
Takeshi Matsuoka

1991 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 1787-1792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigetoshi Fujiyama ◽  
Kiyonori Izuno ◽  
Kazuto Gohshi ◽  
Junji Shibata ◽  
Tatsuo Sato

2009 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 1022-1025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun Jeong Kim ◽  
Sang Wook Oh ◽  
Dong Joon Kim ◽  
Eui Yul Choi

Abstract Background: Although alanine aminotransferase (ALT) is a widely used indicator of liver function, ALT enzymatic activity may not always reflect the degree of liver damage. Improved methods or approaches would be useful. Methods: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to ALT were generated to develop a sandwich enzyme immunoassay system. We used an immunoassay to measure ALT mass concentration and a common biochemical analyzer to assay ALT enzymatic activity in serum samples from patients with liver diseases and healthy individuals. The results from the 2 methods were compared and analyzed by ROC curve analysis. Results: The ALT sandwich enzyme immunoassay system demonstrated reliable performance in linearity, recovery, and imprecision studies. The ALT activity assay exhibited a higher diagnostic accuracy in acute hepatitis (AH) patients, but the ALT immunoassay exhibited higher sensitivity and specificity in patients with chronic liver diseases. The areas under the ROC curve for ALT mass and enzymatic activity were 0.82 and 0.98, respectively, in AH, 0.99 and 0.52 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and 0.94 and 0.45 in liver cirrhosis (LC). Serum samples from HCC and LC patients had higher amounts of ALT–immunoglobulin complexes [median A450, 1.7 (interquartile range, 1.4–1.9)] than the other groups [1.3 (interquartile range, 0.9–1.6)]. Conclusions: Our analysis of sera from the HCC and LC patient groups revealed considerable amounts of immunologically active but catalytically inactive ALT. The amount of the ALT–immunoglobulin complex increased with the severity of the liver disease. The 2-site immunoassay method may be useful in the differential diagnosis of some causes of liver disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document