Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial Comparing Room-Temperature and Heated Lidocaine for Digital Nerve Block

1995 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 677-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
David K Waldbillig ◽  
James V Quinn ◽  
Ian G Stiell ◽  
George A Wells
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 1622-1626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Nejati ◽  
Mohammad Jalili ◽  
Saeed Abbasi ◽  
Farhad Talebi Sarwari ◽  
Ali Bidari ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 490-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. S. SARHADI ◽  
J. SHAW-DUNN

Injection studies using methylene blue and latex were used in 60 digits from 40 cadavers to study how anaesthetic fluid injected into the flexor tendon sheath might spread around the proximal part of the finger. The injected solution escaped from the flexor tendon sheath around the vincular vessels which are present near the base and head of the proximal phalanx. Outside the digital canal, the dye flowed smoothly through the perivascular loose areolar tissue and spread alongside the main digital vessels and nerves and their palmar and dorsal branches.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali H. Yilmaz ◽  
Elif Ziypak ◽  
Tevfik Ziypak ◽  
Mehmet Aksoy ◽  
Senol Adanur ◽  
...  

Introduction: To determine whether a combination of the long acting local anesthetic, bupivacaine, and lidocaine is better than lidocaine alone in the long-term pain control, which is a short-acting anesthetic. Materials and Methods: In group 1, periprostatic nerve block was applied to both neurovascular areas with 2% lidocaine (5 ml) in an isotonic solution (5 ml). In group 2, the combination of 2% lidocaine (5 ml) and 5mg/ml bupivacaine (5 ml) was used for the PPNB. Results: In the first 30 minutes the mean VAS scores of groups 1 and 2 were 2.1 ± 0.2 and 1.2 ± 0.1, respectively (p = 0.002). VAS scores of group II determined at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after the biopsy were significantly lower since it was (p < 0.05). Conclusion: While periprostatic nerve block for late phase pain control, applying a combination of a long-acting local anesthetic, such as bupivacaine, is effective in terms of pain control and patient comfort.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1;19 (1;1) ◽  
pp. E79-E86
Author(s):  
Rioko K. Sakata

Background: Adequate analgesia is important for early hospital discharge after meniscectomy. A femoral nerve block may reduce the need for systemic analgesics, with fewer side effects; however, motor block can occur. Ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block may reduce the required local anesthetic concentration, preventing motor block. Objective: The primary objective of this study was to determine the lowest effective analgesic concentration of bupivacaine in 50% (EC50) and in 90% (EC90) of patients for a successful ultrasoundguided femoral nerve block in arthroscopic knee meniscectomy. Study Design: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Settings: This study was conducted at Hospital São Domingos. Methods: A total of 52 patients undergoing arthroscopic knee meniscectomy were submitted to ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block using 22 mL bupivacaine. The bupivacaine concentration given to a study patient was determined by the response of the previous patient (a biased-coin design up–down sequential method). If the previous patient had a negative response, the bupivacaine concentration was increased by 0.05% for the next case. If the previous patient had a positive response, the next patient was randomized to receive the same bupivacaine concentration (with a probability of 0.89) or to have a decrease by 0.05% (with a probability of 0.11). A successful block was defined by a numerical pain intensity scale score < 4 (0 = no pain; 10 = worst imaginable pain) in 3 different evaluations. If the pain intensity score was ≥ 4 (moderate or severe pain) at any time, the block was considered failed. General anesthesia was induced with 30 μg/kg alfentanil and 2 mg/ kg propofol, followed by propofol maintanance, plus remifentanil if needed. Postoperative analgesia supplementation was performed with dipyrone; ketoprofen and tramadol were given if needed. Data Measurements: The following parameters were evaluated: numerical pain intensity score, duration of analgesia, supplementary analgesic dose in 24 hours, and need for intraoperative remifentanil. Results: The EC50 was 0.160 (95% CI: 0.150 – 0.189), and EC90 was 0.271 (95% CI: 0.196 – 0.300). There was no difference in numerical pain intensity score for the different concentrations of bupivacaine. A successful block was achieved in 45 patients, with no difference according to bupivacaine concentration. Time to first analgesic supplementation dose was longer for bupivacaine concentrations ≥ 0.3% (543.8 ± 283.8 min.), compared to 0.25% (391.3 ± 177.8 min.) and < 0.25% (302.3 ± 210.1 min.). There were no differences in supplementary analgesic dose in 24 hours nor in the use of intraoperative remifentanil according to bupivacaine concentration. Limitations: The analgesic effect was measured only during the first 2 hours. Conclusions: Bupivacaine EC50 for ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block was 0.160 (95% CI: 0.150 – 0.189), and EC90 was 0.271 (95% CI: 0.196 – 0.300). Key words: Postoperative analgesia, femoral block, ultrasound-guided, bupivacaíne minimum concentration, arthroscopic meniscectomy


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document