FDA Approves Silicone Gel—Filled Breast Implants

2006 ◽  
Vol 36 (23) ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
SHERRY BOSCHERT
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Vol 164 (3) ◽  
pp. 164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethan M. Balk ◽  
Amy Earley ◽  
Esther A. Avendano ◽  
Gowri Raman

The Lancet ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 351 (9101) ◽  
pp. 520-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph R Cook ◽  
James M Curtis ◽  
Laura L Perkins ◽  
Susan J Hoshaw
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 693-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Grant Stevens ◽  
Elliot M. Hirsch ◽  
Marissa J. Tenenbaum ◽  
Maria Acevedo

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 264-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark L Jewell ◽  
Bradley P Bengtson ◽  
Kate Smither ◽  
Gina Nuti ◽  
TracyAnn Perry

Author(s):  
V. L. Young ◽  
J. R. Nemecek ◽  
B. D. Schwartz ◽  
D. L. Phelan ◽  
M. W. Schorr

1996 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter Peters ◽  
Dennis Smith ◽  
Stanley Lugowski

There have been three generations of silicone-gel breast implants. First generation implants (thick wall – thick gel with Dacron patches) were made from 1963 to 1972. Second generation implants (thin wall-thin gel) were made from 1972 until the mid 1980s. The introduction of third generation implants (stronger wall, low-bleed) was geographically dependent. In Canada, Dow Corning Silastic II implants were introduced in 1986, and Surgitek SCL implants were introduced in 1988. In the present study, a total of 352 silicone-gel breast implants were removed from 239 patients between 1981 and 1995. Their failure properties were dependent upon their generation (year of manufacture) and, for second generation implants, their duration in situ. Of the 352 implants, 20 were first generation, and all were fully intact. Twenty-eight were third generation implants, and 27 were fully intact. Failure properties of the 302 second generation implants were dependent upon their duration of implantation. A survival curve indicated that these implants began to fail (by leaking or rupturing) after four years in situ. By six years, 40% had failed. After 12 years, 95% had failed. Of the 171 second generation implants removed between 1991 and 1995, 77% had failed. The failure properties were similar for the three main manufacturers: Dow Corning, Heyer-Schulte and Surgitek. The failure rate for second generation implants is much higher than was previously believed. This is particularly significant in view of the current difficulty in diagnosing implant failure.


1993 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-93
Author(s):  
Howard A. Tobin

This article summarizes the regulatory actions of the Food & Drug Administration as related to gel-filled silicone breast implants. It also relates the actions to the influences of outside forces such as press coverage, congressional investigations, and consumer activism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document