Abstract
Introduction
mitral regurgitation is often associated with severe aortic stenosis but the indications for its correction at the time of aortic valve surgery are still unclear. Despite the indication for mitral valve repair or replacement in the case of severe secondary mitral regurgitation, many patients are left untreated. This is due to the common belief that secondary mitral regurgitation mostly improves after the aortic valve is treated.
Purpose
the aim of the study is to investigate the prevalence and distribution of mitral calcifications, their role in the development of mitral regurgitation and in its reduction after aortic valve replacement.
Methods
we reviewed all patient’s records who underwent aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis at our institution from 12/2014 to 12/2016. Pre and post-operative echocardiograms were reviewed by experienced echocardiographer. Patients were then divided into 4 categories (functional, mild, moderate and severe calcification) on the basis of the presence, distribuition and severity of calcification on the mitral apparatus.
Results
at the end 651 patients were collected and analyzed. Mean age was 74yo. 334 (51,4%) of them were males. Most patients (63,1%) had only mild mitral regurgitation but 147 (22,6%) of them had moderate or severe mitral regurgitation. The presences of moderate or severe calcification of the mitral apparatus resulted to be a risk factor for the presence of mitral regurgitation associated with aortic stenosis as shown in Table 1. After surgical aortic valve replacement less than 21% of the patients showed a reduction of the degree of mitral regurgitation. We found no statistical difference between groups about mitral regurgitation changes after aortic valve replacement.
Conclusions
Mitral regurgitation is a common finding in patients with severe aortic stenosis and it’s prevalence is higher in patients with mitral calcifications. Few patients, however showed a reduction in the degree of mitral regurgitation after surgical aortic valve replacement with no difference related to the severity of annular or leaflets calcifications.
TABLE 1 Logistic regression for the presence of mitral regurgitation Mitral Regurgitation Change after Aortic Valve Replacement CALCIFICATION DEGREE OR C.I. 95% p Reduced p Unchanged p Increased p Functional 53(21%) 176(71%) 18(7%) Mild 1.244571 0.81 - 1.93 0.32 28(20%) 0.86 105(76%) 0.43 6(4%) 0.34 Moderate 1.637297 1.05 - 2.56 0.03* 25(17%) 0.41 109(76%) 0.34 9(6%) 0.86 Severe 2.369245 1.46 - 3.85 <0.01* 29(25%) 0.48 78(68%) 0.67 7(6%) 0.86 OR= Odds Ratio; C.I.=Confidence Interval; Functional= no calcification; Mild, Moderate and Severe= degree of mitral annular and leaflets calcifications.
Presence of mitral annular calcification predicts improvement in mitral regurgitation after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis
