scholarly journals HYBRID ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR FOR THORACIC AORTIC DISEASE INVOLVING AORTIC ARCH

2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (10) ◽  
pp. A1755
Author(s):  
Myeong Gun Kim ◽  
Woong Chol Kang ◽  
Pyung Chun Oh ◽  
Eak Kyun Shin ◽  
Yae Min Park ◽  
...  
Cardiology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 123 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Hornick ◽  
Remo Moomiaie ◽  
Hamid Mojibian ◽  
Bulat Ziganshin ◽  
Zakaria Almuwaqqat ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 609-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus G.M. Steinbauer ◽  
Alexander Stehr ◽  
Karin Pfister ◽  
Thomas Herold ◽  
Niels Zorger ◽  
...  

Vascular ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 148-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saiqa Sayed ◽  
Matt M. Thompson

The purpose was to review outcome data following endovascular repair of the descending thoracic aorta from reports published between 1994 and 2004. To accomplish this task, 1,518 patients underwent endovascular repair for thoracic aortic disease; 810 thoracic aortic aneurysms, 500 type B thoracic aortic dissections, and 106 traumatic ruptures. The 30-day mortality rate was 5.5% and 6% for late postoperative deaths. The primary technical success rate was 97%, with only 15 patients requiring open conversion. Neurologic deficits occurred in 29 patients. In total, 118 endoleaks were reported; 29 were restented, and the remainder required surgical intervention. Graft infection occurred in 6 cases, and migrations were detected in 10. The conclusion reached is that endovascular repair of descending thoracic aortic disease is feasible and can be achieved with low rates of perioperative morbidity and mortality. As few long-term data exist on the durability of thoracic stent grafts, lifelong surveillance remains necessary.


Author(s):  
Massimiliano M Marrocco-Trischitta ◽  
Mattia Glauber

Abstract Contemporary guidelines on thoracic aortic repair provide inconsistent reporting standards for the definition of aortic arch classification in Types I, II and III. The different reported criteria cannot be used interchangeably, due to a very low level of concordance, and this finding has relevant implications for the comparisons between studies using different classifications, and between different datasets of multicentre trials, which are not consistently analyzed with the same criteria. Also, the reported definitions, which were originally proposed for predicting difficult carotid stenting and therefore were conceived for healthy aortic arches, can be influenced by the pathological derangements of the aortic wall, including aneurysms and dissections. In this respect, the Madhwal’s classification, which is based on the diameter of the left common carotid artery, appears to be the more suitable one for aortic arch classification in patients with thoracic aortic disease because it provides relevant clinical information along with an adequate reproducibility.


2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. e593-e594
Author(s):  
Moad Alaidroos ◽  
Rodrigo M. Romarowski ◽  
Francesco Secchi ◽  
Paolo Righini ◽  
Giovanni Nano ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 149 (6) ◽  
pp. 1586-1592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Dumfarth ◽  
Alan S. Chou ◽  
Bulat A. Ziganshin ◽  
Rohan Bhandari ◽  
Sven Peterss ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 284 ◽  
pp. 84-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bader Aldeen Alhafez ◽  
Van Thi Thanh Truong ◽  
Daniel Ocazionez ◽  
Sahand Sohrabi ◽  
Harleen Sandhu ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 269-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedikt V. Czermak ◽  
Gustav Fraedrich ◽  
Reinhold Perkmann ◽  
Ammar Mallouhi ◽  
Iris E. Steingruber ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document