scholarly journals A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Bovine Aortic Arch Variant as a Determinant of Thoracic Aortic Disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. e593-e594
Author(s):  
Moad Alaidroos ◽  
Rodrigo M. Romarowski ◽  
Francesco Secchi ◽  
Paolo Righini ◽  
Giovanni Nano ◽  
...  
Cardiology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 123 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Hornick ◽  
Remo Moomiaie ◽  
Hamid Mojibian ◽  
Bulat Ziganshin ◽  
Zakaria Almuwaqqat ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 1094-1098.e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stewart R. Walsh ◽  
Tjun Y. Tang ◽  
Umar Sadat ◽  
Jag Naik ◽  
Michael E. Gaunt ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 305-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue Li ◽  
Zhongzhou Hu ◽  
Jianchang Wang ◽  
Yue Zhang ◽  
Zhong Chen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Massimiliano M Marrocco-Trischitta ◽  
Mattia Glauber

Abstract Contemporary guidelines on thoracic aortic repair provide inconsistent reporting standards for the definition of aortic arch classification in Types I, II and III. The different reported criteria cannot be used interchangeably, due to a very low level of concordance, and this finding has relevant implications for the comparisons between studies using different classifications, and between different datasets of multicentre trials, which are not consistently analyzed with the same criteria. Also, the reported definitions, which were originally proposed for predicting difficult carotid stenting and therefore were conceived for healthy aortic arches, can be influenced by the pathological derangements of the aortic wall, including aneurysms and dissections. In this respect, the Madhwal’s classification, which is based on the diameter of the left common carotid artery, appears to be the more suitable one for aortic arch classification in patients with thoracic aortic disease because it provides relevant clinical information along with an adequate reproducibility.


2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (10) ◽  
pp. A1755
Author(s):  
Myeong Gun Kim ◽  
Woong Chol Kang ◽  
Pyung Chun Oh ◽  
Eak Kyun Shin ◽  
Yae Min Park ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yue Li ◽  
Changshun He ◽  
Xia Chen ◽  
Jing Yao ◽  
Tao Zhang ◽  
...  

Open Heart ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam J Brownstein ◽  
Syed Usman Bin Mahmood ◽  
Ayman Saeyeldin ◽  
Camilo Velasquez Mejia ◽  
Mohammad A Zafar ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the prevalence of thoracic aortic disease (TAD) and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) among patients with simple renal cyst (SRC) and bovine aortic arch (BAA).MethodsThrough a retrospective search for patients who underwent both chest and abdominal CT imaging at our institution from 2012 to 2016, we identified patients with SRC and BAA and propensity score matched them to those without these features by age, gender and presence of hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes and chronic kidney disease.ResultsOf a total of 35 498 patients, 6366 were found to have SRC. Compared with the matched population without SRC, individuals with SRC were significantly more likely to have TAD (10.1% vs 3.9%), ascending aortic aneurysm (8.0% vs 3.2%), descending aortic aneurysm (3.3% vs 0.9%), type A aortic dissection (0.6% vs 0.2%), type B aortic dissection (1.1% vs 0.3%) and AAA (7.9% vs 3.3%). The 920 patients identified with BAA were significantly more likely to have TAD (21.8% vs 4.5%), ascending aortic aneurysm (18.4% vs 3.2%), descending aortic aneurysm (6.5% vs 2.0%), type A aortic dissection (1.4% vs 0.4%) and type B aortic dissection (2.4% vs 0.7%) than the matched population without BAA. SRC and BAA were found to be significantly associated with the presence of TAD (OR=2.57 and 7.69, respectively) and AAA (OR=2.81 and 2.56, respectively) on multivariable analysis.ConclusionsThis study establishes a substantial increased prevalence of aortic disease among patients with SRC and BAA. SRC and BAA should be considered markers for aortic aneurysm development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document