Change to Win: Can Structural Reform Revitalize the American Labor Movement?

Author(s):  
Jack Fiorito ◽  
Paul Jarley ◽  
John T. Delaney
Labor History ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 592-606
Author(s):  
Miriam Frank ◽  
Martin Glaberman

1941 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-87
Author(s):  
Harry J. Carman

T. V. Powderly, Grand Master Workman of the Noble Order of the Knights of Labor from 1879 to 1893, has been portrayed in many different ways—as idealist, reformer, humanitarian, windbag, renegade, crook, imposter, agitator, introvert, self-seeker, charlatan, cheap politician, turncoat, rabble rouser, and drippy sentimentalist. Some claim that he was a great labor leader; others just as vigorously maintain that he was utterly lacking in the qualities of leadership—that he was, in reality, an insignificant nobody swept along by the changing currents of the American labor movement. It is not the purpose of this short article to paint a full-length portrait of Powderly but rather, on the basis of newly discovered data, to indicate briefly which, if any, of the above characterizations fit the man.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document