SUBCUTANEOUS TRANSPOSITION OF THE ULNAR NERVE FOR TREATMENT OF CUBITAL TUNNEL SYNDROME

Hand Clinics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 421-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Lee Osterman ◽  
Craig A. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Subcutaneous Transposition

scholarly journals Ulnar Nerve Neuropathy Secondary to “Snapping Triceps Syndrome”

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 2513826X1771645
Author(s):  
Stahs Pripotnev ◽  
Colin White
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Dominant Male ◽  
Ulnar Nerve Compression ◽  
Compression Neuropathy ◽  
History Of ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Subcutaneous Transposition ◽  
Abnormal Anatomy

Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common compression neuropathy of the upper extremity and the most common point of compression for the ulnar nerve. We present a case of ulnar nerve compression neuropathy at the elbow secondary to an abnormal subluxating medial head of triceps. A 37-year-old right hand dominant male presented with a history of bilateral medial elbow pain and ulnar distribution hand numbness. During his left cubital tunnel release surgery, the abnormal anatomy was noted. Initial subfascial anterior transposition was insufficient and had to be revised to a subcutaneous transposition intraoperatively. Failure to recognize the contribution of triceps abnormalities can lead to incomplete resolution following surgery. Surgeons should be wary of uncommon findings and adjust their approach appropriately.

scholarly journals Anterior subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve improves neurological function in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tian-bing Wang ◽  
Bao-guo Jiang ◽  
Wei Huang ◽  
Pei-xun Zhang ◽  
Zhang Peng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Neurological Function ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Subcutaneous Transposition

Comparative Clinical Outcomes of Submuscular and Subcutaneous Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 866-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yann Philippe Charles ◽  
Bertrand Coulet ◽  
Jean-Claude Rouzaud ◽  
Jean-Pierre Daures ◽  
Michel Chammas
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Subcutaneous Transposition

Comparison of Simple Decompression and Anterior Subcutaneous Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve for the Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 451-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taskin Altay ◽  
Kamil Yamak ◽  
Şemmi Koyuncu ◽  
Cemil Kayali ◽  
Serkan Sözkesen
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Nerve Paralysis ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Subcutaneous Transposition ◽  
Simple Decompression ◽  
Group 1

Background. In this study, we aim to evaluate clinical and functional results in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome who were treated with subcutaneous anterior transposition vs simple decompression of the ulnar nerve. Material and methods. Fifty-five patients were separated into two groups according to surgical technique. Group 1 comprised 35 patients (23 males, 12 females; mean age, 42.1 years; range, 28–56 years) who underwent anterior subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve, whereas Group 2 included 20 patients (11 males, 9 females; mean age, 47.4 years; range, 25–59 years) who underwent simple decompression of the ulnar nerve. Results. The mean modified Bishop scores were 7.26 and 7.85 in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (P< .05). The mean Q-DASH scores were 16.94 in Group 1 and 15.80 in Group 2 (P> .05). Postoperatively, paraesthesia regressed in 17 (85.7%) and 30 (85%) patients in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (P> .05). Both groups demonstrated improvement in ulnar nerve function in comparison with the preoperative period, and ulnar nerve paralysis was not seen in any of our patients. A postsurgical incision scar developed in six (17.1%) and three patients (15%) in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. Conclusion. Both simple decompression and anterior subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve are effective and safe for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome, so we would favour simple decompression as it is a less extensive procedure.

scholarly journals Subcutaneous vs Submuscular Ulnar Nerve Transposition in Moderate Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhia A.K Jaddue ◽  
Salwan A Saloo ◽  
Arkan S Sayed-Noor
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Anterior Transposition ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Subcutaneous Transposition

Background: The surgical treatment of Cubital tunnel syndrome (CubTS) is still a matter of debate. No consensus exists about the necessity of anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve after decompression. However, this technique is fairly common in clinical practice. Material and Methodology: In the present study we compared the operative technique (incision length, operative time), postoperative care (postoperative pain and complications) and the outcome between subcutaneous transposition and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve as two surgical modalities in treating moderate CubTS. Between March 2004 and March 2007, twenty six patients with moderate CubTS (according to Dellon’s grading system) were stratified according to age and gender into these two surgical techniques. The two groups were prospectively followed up 2 weeks, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively by the same observer and the operation outcome was assessed using the Bishop rating system. Results: We found that the subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve was associated with shorter incision, shorter operative time, less postoperative pain, less postoperative complication and better outcome compared with the submuscular transposition. Conclusion: The authors recommend the subcutaneous technique when considering anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve in treating moderate CubTS.

Long-term Reoperation Rate for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Subcutaneous Transposition Versus In Situ Decompression

Hand ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 155894471987315
Author(s):  
Douglas T. Hutchinson ◽  
Ryan Sullivan ◽  
Micah K. Sinclair
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Reoperation Rate ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Multicenter Cohort Study ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Subcutaneous Transposition

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term revision rate of in situ ulnar nerve decompression with anterior subcutaneous transposition surgery for idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter, cohort study compared patients who underwent ulnar nerve surgery with a minimum 5 years of follow-up. The primary outcome studied was the need for revision cubital tunnel surgery. In total, there were 132 cases corresponding to 119 patients. The cohorts were matched for age and comorbidity. Results: The long-term reoperation rate for in situ decompression was 25% compared with 12% for anterior subcutaneous transposition. Seventy-eight percent of revisions of in situ decompression were performed within the first 3 years. Younger age and female sex were identified as independent predictors of need for revision. Conclusions: In the long-term follow-up, in situ decompression is seen to have a statistically significant higher reoperation rate compared with subcutaneous transposition.

Regional Ulnar Nerve Strain Following Decompression and Anterior Subcutaneous Transposition in Patients With Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. e343-e350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Foran ◽  
Kenneth Vaz ◽  
Jakub Sikora-Klak ◽  
Samuel R. Ward ◽  
Eric R. Hentzen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Subcutaneous Transposition

scholarly journals Intramuscular compared with subcutaneous transposition for surgery in cubital tunnel syndrome

2017 ◽  
Vol 99 (8) ◽  
pp. 653-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
MR Emamhadi ◽  
AR Emamhadi ◽  
S Andalib
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Motor Recovery ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Pain Sensation ◽  
Total Satisfaction ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Force Recovery ◽  
Subcutaneous Transposition ◽  
Surgical Treatments

Background There is no consensus on the most effective surgical technique in the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. Anterior subcutaneous transposition (AST) and anterior intramuscular transposition (AIT) are common surgical treatments in this regard. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of these two surgeries for cubital tunnel syndrome. Methods In a retrospective study, we compared surgical outcomes (pain, sensation, motor recovery, atrophy, and total satisfaction) in 40 patients undergoing AIT and 43 undergoing AST of the ulnar nerve. Results The patients undergoing AIT showed a significant improvement in all the outcomes after the surgery (P = 0); however, those undergoing AST only experienced an improvement in pain and sensation after the surgery (P = 0). Comparing the two surgeries, we found that there was a high total satisfaction with AIT compared with AST (P = 0). When we independently compared each outcome in the two groups, we found that the muscle force recovery was significantly improved in the AIT group compared with the AST group (P = 0). Conclusions AIT is preferable to AST for the surgical treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. In particular, AIT achieves a better motor recovery of the ulnar nerve compared with AST.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document