Proximal femoral osteotomy as an adjunct in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty

1987 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew H. Glassman ◽  
Charles A. Engh ◽  
J. Dennis Bobyn
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Osteotomy ◽  
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Proximal Femoral Osteotomy

Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Modular S-ROM Prosthesis Combined with Corrective Proximal Femoral Osteotomy

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 664-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin Onodera ◽  
Tokifumi Majima ◽  
Hiroshi Ito ◽  
Takeo Matsuno ◽  
Takafumi Kishimoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Osteotomy ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Proximal Femoral Osteotomy

Clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular or non-modular stems: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110043
Author(s):  
Antonios A Koutalos ◽  
Sokratis Varitimidis ◽  
Konstantinos N Malizos ◽  
Theofilos Karachalios
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Rate ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Fracture Rate ◽  
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes

Purpose: The aim of the study was to systematically evaluate clinical outcomes of tapered fluted stems, either monoblock or modular, in revision total hip arthroplasty. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science and Cochrane databases were systematically searched by 2 researchers. Clinical studies reporting primarily on survival and re-revision rates, and secondarily on subsidence, dislocation, intraoperative fractures, periprosthetic fractures and infection were included. 2 investigators assessed the quality of the studies. Results: 46 studies were included in this review, reporting on 4601 stem revisions. The pooled re-revision rate was 5.1% and long-term survival ranged from 75% to 98.5%. No differences were observed between monoblock and modular stems regarding re-revision rate, dislocation rate, periprosthetic fracture rate or infection rates. Monoblock stems exhibited more subsidence and modular stems displayed more intraoperative fractures. Conclusions: Satisfactory results can be obtained with the use of tapered fluted end-bearing stems. Monoblock stems offer the same clinical results as modular stems.

Injury to the Colon During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

2008 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 881-884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsey S. Hagstrom ◽  
Dennis J. Callahan ◽  
James W. Green
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Hip
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document