Treatment of type III acetabular deficiencies in revision total hip arthroplasty without structural bone—graft

1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles J. Sutherland
2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 2023-2030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanqing Mao ◽  
Chen Xu ◽  
Jiawei Xu ◽  
Huiwu Li ◽  
Fengxiang Liu ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (6) ◽  
pp. 725-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Gibon ◽  
N. Barut ◽  
J-P. Courpied ◽  
M. Hamadouche

Aims The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the minimum five-year outcome of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device (KARD) in patients with Paprosky type III acetabular defects and destruction of the inferior margin of the acetabulum. Patients and Methods We identified 36 patients (37 hips) who underwent revision THA under these circumstances using the KARD, fresh frozen allograft femoral heads, and reconstruction of the inferior margin of the acetabulum. The Merle d’Aubigné system was used for clinical assessment. Serial anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were used to assess migration of the acetabular component. Results At a mean follow-up of 8.2 years (5 to 19.3), the mean Merle d’Aubigné score increased from 12.5 (5 to 18) preoperatively to 16.5 (10 to 18) (p < 0.0001). The survival rate at ten years was 95.3% (sd 4.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 86.4 to 100) and 76.5% (sd 9.9, 95% CI 57.0 to 95.9) using aseptic loosening and radiological loosening as the endpoints, respectively. Conclusion These results show that the use of the KARD with reconstruction of the inferior margin of the acetabulum in revision THA is associated with acceptable clinical results and survival at mid-term follow-up with, however, a high rate of migration of the acetabular component of 21.6%. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:725–32.


2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hargovind DeWal ◽  
Frank Chen ◽  
Edward Su ◽  
Paul E. Di Cesare

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document