NEURAL CORRELATES OF PLEASANT AND UNPLEASANT EPISODIC MEMORY RETRIEVAL

NeuroImage ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. S900
Author(s):  
R.D. Lane ◽  
P.M-L. Chua ◽  
P.C. Fletcher ◽  
R.J. Dolan
NeuroImage ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 317-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Cabeza ◽  
Florin Dolcos ◽  
Reiko Graham ◽  
Lars Nyberg

1998 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheri L Wiggs ◽  
Jill Weisberg ◽  
Alex Martin

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 4150-4163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie St-Laurent ◽  
Hervé Abdi ◽  
Hana Burianová ◽  
Cheryl L. Grady

We used fMRI to assess the neural correlates of autobiographical, semantic, and episodic memory retrieval in healthy young and older adults. Participants were tested with an event-related paradigm in which retrieval demand was the only factor varying between trials. A spatio-temporal partial least square analysis was conducted to identify the main patterns of activity characterizing the groups across conditions. We identified brain regions activated by all three memory conditions relative to a control condition. This pattern was expressed equally in both age groups and replicated previous findings obtained in a separate group of younger adults. We also identified regions whose activity differentiated among the different memory conditions. These patterns of differentiation were expressed less strongly in the older adults than in the young adults, a finding that was further confirmed by a barycentric discriminant analysis. This analysis showed an age-related dedifferentiation in autobiographical and episodic memory tasks but not in the semantic memory task or the control condition. These findings suggest that the activation of a common memory retrieval network is maintained with age, whereas the specific aspects of brain activity that differ with memory content are more vulnerable and less selectively engaged in older adults. Our results provide a potential neural mechanism for the well-known age differences in episodic/autobiographical memory, and preserved semantic memory, observed when older adults are compared with younger adults.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirko Lehmann ◽  
Claudia Neumann ◽  
Sven Wasserthal ◽  
Johannes Schultz ◽  
Achilles Delis ◽  
...  

Abstract Only little research has been conducted on the pharmacological underpinnings of metacognition. Here, we tested the modulatory effects of a single intravenous dose (100 ng/ml) of the N-methyl-D-aspartate-glutamate-receptor antagonist ketamine, a compound known to induce altered states of consciousness, on metacognition and its neural correlates. Fifty-three young, healthy adults completed two study phases of an episodic memory task involving both encoding and retrieval in a double-blind, placebo-controlled fMRI study. Trial-by-trial confidence ratings were collected during retrieval. Effects on the subjective state of consciousness were assessed using the 5D-ASC questionnaire. Confirming that the drug elicited a psychedelic state, there were effects of ketamine on all 5D-ASC scales. Acute ketamine administration during retrieval had deleterious effects on metacognitive sensitivity (meta-d′) and led to larger metacognitive bias, with retrieval performance (d′) and reaction times remaining unaffected. However, there was no ketamine effect on metacognitive efficiency (meta-d′/d′). Measures of the BOLD signal revealed that ketamine compared to placebo elicited higher activation of posterior cortical brain areas, including superior and inferior parietal lobe, calcarine gyrus, and lingual gyrus, albeit not specific to metacognitive confidence ratings. Ketamine administered during encoding did not significantly affect performance or brain activation. Overall, our findings suggest that ketamine impacts metacognition, leading to significantly larger metacognitive bias and deterioration of metacognitive sensitivity as well as unspecific activation increases in posterior hot zone areas of the neural correlates of consciousness.


2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 2242-2259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin R. Geib ◽  
Matthew L. Stanley ◽  
Nancy A. Dennis ◽  
Marty G. Woldorff ◽  
Roberto Cabeza

2010 ◽  
Vol 182 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Lepage ◽  
Marc Pelletier ◽  
Amélie Achim ◽  
Alonso Montoya ◽  
Matthew Menear ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document