P12.14 Intraoperative neurophysiological facial nerve monitoring during cerebellopontine angle (CPA) surgeries: the role of blink reflex

2011 ◽  
Vol 122 ◽  
pp. S118
Author(s):  
V. Tugnoli ◽  
E. Sette ◽  
J.G. Capone ◽  
M. Cavallo ◽  
M. Farneti ◽  
...  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 9-27
Author(s):  
Ahmed A. Farag ◽  
Abd El-Kafy Sharaf El-Din Ibrahim ◽  
Islam M. Alaghory

2020 ◽  
Vol 163 (3) ◽  
pp. 572-576
Author(s):  
Kelsey Casano ◽  
Gerard Giangrosso ◽  
Gauri Mankekar ◽  
Alexander Sevy ◽  
Rahul Mehta ◽  
...  

Objective This study assesses the role of facial nerve monitoring (FNM) for intraoperative decision making during otologic surgery and possible benefits beyond protecting facial nerve integrity. Study Design This prospective study examines intraoperative FNM data and structured interviews collected during 52 otologic procedures. Setting Tertiary referral center. Subjects and Methods Subjects include adults and children undergoing middle ear or mastoid surgery. Data include intraoperative neuromonitoring activity and structured interviews conducted with the operating surgeon immediately following surgery. Results Facial nerve stimulation was used to confirm the position of the nerve in 42 of 52 surgical procedures. In 26.9% of cases, the patient became “light” and moved under anesthesia, which was predicted by neuromonitoring 71.4% of the time. Through structured interviews, the operating surgeons reported the following. (1) The facial nerve took an unexpected anatomic course in 7.8% of patients and was difficult to identify in 39.2%. (2) The nerve was at increased risk of injury in 66.7% of cases due to chronic disease or previous surgery. (3) Among these high-risk cases, the monitor helped reduce the risk of nerve damage 100% of the time. (4) Neuromonitoring allowed the surgeon to operate faster 86.5% of the time, and (5) FNM allowed the resident to perform more of the operation 68.9% of the time. No patients experienced postoperative facial weakness. Conclusions Beyond potentially protecting facial nerve integrity, this study identified additional benefits of FNM, including warning of patient movement during anesthesia, confirming facial nerve anatomic location, reducing operative time, and enhancing resident surgical experience.


2013 ◽  
Vol 124 (11) ◽  
pp. e209 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Simioni ◽  
J.G. Capone ◽  
E. Sette ◽  
M. Cavallo ◽  
M. Farneti ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 149 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P192-P192
Author(s):  
Jiahui Lin ◽  
William I. Kuhel ◽  
Erich P. Voigt ◽  
Marc A. Cohen ◽  
David I. Kutler

1994 ◽  
Vol 108 (7) ◽  
pp. 551-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Wiet ◽  
George P. Bauer ◽  
Don Stewart ◽  
John J. Zappia

AbstractIntraoperative facial nerve monitoring has become an integral adjunct in facial nerve identification and preservation for patients undergoing cerebellopontine angle surgery. Since the first description of EMG monitoring of facial nerve activity intraoperatively, many systems have been developed. These systems often rely on unilateral monitoring of the facial nerve with auditory feedback to the surgeon, and it is difficult to distinguish between artifact and significant stimulation of the facial nerve.In this paper, we present the use of a bilateral, multialarm, facial nerve monitoring system that has multiple advantages over previous systems. Furthermore, we review our experience with this bilateral system, comparing a group of 50 monitored patients to a group of 50 unmonitored patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document