The early and midterm outcomes of ventral only buccal mucosal graft substitution urethroplasty for female urethral stricture

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e1772
Author(s):  
B. Mukhtar ◽  
M. Spilotros ◽  
J. Fairbanks ◽  
M. Pakzad ◽  
R. Hamid ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 525-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Apul Goel ◽  
Sagorika Paul ◽  
Divakar Dalela ◽  
Pushpalata Sankhwar ◽  
Satya Narayan Sankhwar ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 2191-2193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrey Petrikovets ◽  
Helen H. Sun ◽  
Jonathan Kiechle ◽  
Graham C. Chapman ◽  
Christopher M. Gonzalez ◽  
...  

Urology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Praanjal Gupta ◽  
Sidhartha Kalra ◽  
Lalgudi Narayanan Dorairajan ◽  
Ramanitharan Manikandan ◽  
Sreerag KS ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swarnendu Mandal ◽  
Prasant Nayak ◽  
Manoj Das

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-68
Author(s):  
Mrinmoy Biswas ◽  
Sudip Das Gupta ◽  
Mohammed Mizanur Rahman ◽  
Sharif Mohammad Wasimuddin

Objective: To assess the success of BMG urethroplasty in long segment anterior urethral stricture. Method: From January 2014 to December 2015, twenty male patients with long anterior segment urethral stricture were managed by BMG urethroplasty. After voiding trial they were followed up at 3 month with Uroflowmetry, RGU & MCU and PVR measurement by USG. Patients were further followed up with Uroflowmetry and PVR at 6 months interval.Successful outcome was defined as normal voiding with a maximum flow rate >15ml /sec and PVR<50 ml with consideration of maximum one attempt of OIU after catheter removal. Results: Mean stricture length was 5.2 cm (range 3-9 cm) and mean follow-up was 15.55 months (range 6-23 months). Only two patients developed stricture at proximal anastomotic site during follow-up. One of them voided normally after single attempt of OIU. Other one required second attempt of OIU and was considered as failure (5%). Conclusion: BMG urethroplasty is a simple technique with good surgical outcome. Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol. 19, No. 2, July 2016 p.64-68


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 2863-2872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malte W. Vetterlein ◽  
◽  
Luis A. Kluth ◽  
Valentin Zumstein ◽  
Christian P. Meyer ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To evaluate objective treatment success and subjective patient-reported outcomes in patients with radiation-induced urethral strictures undergoing single-stage urethroplasty. Patients and methods Monocentric study of patients who underwent single-stage ventral onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for a radiation-induced stricture between January 2009 and December 2016. Patients were characterized by descriptive analyses. Kaplan–Meier estimates were employed to plot recurrence-free survival. Recurrence was defined as any subsequent urethral instrumentation (dilation, urethrotomy, urethroplasty). Patient-reported functional outcomes were evaluated using the validated German extension of the Urethral Stricture Surgery Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (USS PROM). Results Overall, 47 patients were available for final analyses. Median age was 70 (IQR 65–74). Except for two, all patients had undergone pelvic radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Predominant modality was external beam radiation therapy in 70% of patients. Stricture recurrence rate was 33% at a median follow-up of 44 months (IQR 28–68). In 37 patients with available USS PROM data, mean six-item LUTS score was 7.2 (SD 4.3). Mean ICIQ sum score was 9.8 (SD 5.4). Overall, 53% of patients reported daily leaking and of all, 26% patients underwent subsequent artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Mean IIEF-EF score was 4.4 (SD 7.1), indicating severe erectile dysfunction. In 38 patients with data regarding the generic health status and treatment satisfaction, mean EQ-5D index score and EQ VAS score was 0.91 (SD 0.15) and 65 (SD 21), respectively. Overall, 71% of patients were satisfied with the outcome. Conclusion The success rate and functional outcome after BMGU for radiation-induced strictures were reasonable. However, compared to existing long-term data on non-irradiated patients, the outcome is impaired and patients should be counseled accordingly.


Author(s):  
Adem Emrah Coguplugil ◽  
Turgay Ebiloglu ◽  
Selcuk Sarikaya ◽  
Sercan Yilmaz ◽  
Bahadir Topuz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document