Just the Facts: how to teach emergency department flow management

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 459-462
Author(s):  
Teresa M. Chan ◽  
Jonathan Sherbino ◽  
Arthur Welsher ◽  
Alexander Chorley ◽  
Alim Pardhan

Even before starting your evening shift you know it's going to be busy. Ambulances are lined up in front of the hospital, and the charge nurse already seems stressed out. The senior Emergency Medicine (EM) resident is standing in the physician office, ready to start her shift as well. You have worked with her a few times during this rotation. She is competent, you trust in her management plans for all her individual patients. Together you both review the patient tracker: a variety of patient presentations ready to be seen, plus an additional 20 patients in the waiting room. Negotiating the learning objective for the shift, the resident indicates that she would like to work on more efficiently managing patient flow and the administration of the emergency department (ED). But…isn't that a skill you just learn from experience? You wonder what evidence-informed strategies might exist for training her for this next step.

CJEM ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 6 (04) ◽  
pp. 271-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel G. Campbell ◽  
Douglas E. Sinclair ◽  

ABSTRACT In a time of increased patient loads and emergency department (ED) exit block, the need for strategies to manage patient flow in the ED has become increasingly important. In March 2002 we contacted all 1282 members of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians and asked them to delineate strategies for enhancing ED patient flow and ED productivity without increasing stress levels, reducing care standards or compromising patient safety. Thirty physicians responded. Their suggested flow management strategies, which ranged from clinical decision-making to communication to choreography of time, space and personnel, are summarized here.


2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 1045-1052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Nugus ◽  
Anna Holdgate ◽  
Margaret Fry ◽  
Roberto Forero ◽  
Sally McCarthy ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 654-665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Patey ◽  
Paul Norman ◽  
Mehdee Araee ◽  
Shabnam Asghari ◽  
Thomas Heeley ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 13-18
Author(s):  
Asher L Mandel ◽  
Thomas Bove ◽  
Amisha D Parekh ◽  
Paris Datillo ◽  
Joseph Bove Jr ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.Y. Lee ◽  
E.M. Khoo

70 patients presented with acute asthma exacerbation requiring nebulised bronchodilator treatment at the emergency department of a teaching hospital in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, were interviewed over a two-week period in July 2001. The results showed that 45 (64%) patients had not been educated on the nature of asthma; 30 (43%) had not been advised on preventive measures or avoidance of triggers; 54 (77%) were not advised about the medications used and their side effects; 42 (60%) patients did not know the difference between reliever and preventive medications; 37 (53%) were unable to recognize features of worsening asthma and 68 (97%) were not told about the danger of non-prescribed self-medication or traditional medications. Only six (9%) patients were using peak flow meters and were taught self-management plans. The multiple regression results suggest that patients who were followed up at teaching hospital based clinics were better educated on asthma. In conclusion, asthmatic patients are still not educated well about their disease. Health care providers need to put more emphasis on asthma education so that the number of emergency room visits can be reduced. Asia Pac J Public Health 2004; 16(1): 45-49.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document