The Persistence of Harvest Shocks in Medieval England

2019 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 954-988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cliff T. Bekar

I present evidence that shocks to the Medieval English harvest persisted. Hypothesized mechanisms include varying supplies of seed corn and other complementary harvest inputs. Peasants are modeled as trading off current consumption against grain stores and sow rates so that subsistence-level shocks may persist. For my sample I find that a failed harvest increased the probability of subsequent harvest failure by 20–30 percent. Grain yields are analyzed as a strongly balanced panel by year, manor, and crop. While I reject the hypothesis that harvests were self-contained annual events, I caution against linking harvest persistence directly to runs in grain prices.

2011 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 859-886 ◽  
Author(s):  
BRUCE M.S. CAMPBELL ◽  
CORMAC Ó GRÁDA

The frequency of bad harvests and price elasticity of demand are measured using new data on English grain yields 1268–1480 and 1750–1850 and a revised price series. The analysis shows that major harvest shortfalls were a significant component of most historical subsistence crises, as back-to-back shortfalls were of the worst famines. Although serious harvest shortfalls long remained an unavoidable fact of economic life, by c.1800 yields had become less variable and prices less harvest sensitive. By the eve of the Industrial Revolution, England had become effectively famine-free.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document