scholarly journals Private Equity Firms’ Reputational Concerns and the Costs of Debt Financing

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rongbing Huang ◽  
Jay R. Ritter ◽  
Donghang Zhang

AbstractA popular view is that private equity (PE) firms tend to expropriate other stakeholders of their portfolio companies. Bonds offered during 1992–2011 by companies after their initial public offerings (IPOs) do not reflect this view. We find that yield spreads on bonds offered by PE-backed companies are, on average, 70 basis points lower, holding other things constant. We also find that PE-backed companies have more conservative investment and dividend policies after bond offerings compared with non-PE-backed companies. These results suggest that PE firms’ reputational concerns dominate their wealth expropriation incentives and help their portfolio companies reduce the costs of debt.

Significance More merger and acquisition (M&A) activity, shareholder activism and earnings-enhancing share buyback programmes have more than offset the supply of new equity from initial public offerings (IPOs). Institutional investors are increasingly seeking higher returns from alternative assets such as private equity and a rising number of companies now have capital-light business models. Impacts Greater interest from retail investors could boost demand for shares in companies with smaller market capitalisations. Rising concentration in many industries will attract interest from anti-trust authorities, particularly technology, retail and transport. If rising inflation eventually triggers interest rate increases, debt financing will be less attractive compared to equity financing.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-409
Author(s):  
Till Drebinger ◽  
Shailendra Kumar Rai ◽  
Heiko Hinrichs

We examine 616 Indian initial public offerings (IPOs), including 116 IPOs backed by private equity (PE), between 2000 and 2016, to test whether PE-backed IPOs perform better than non-PE-backed IPOs in the short run as well as in the long run in terms of cumulative abnormal returns (CARs). We also examine the impact of the PE firm nationality on post-IPO performance. Consistent with the existing literature, we find underperformance for all IPOs, on an average, within 1 year. However, PE-backed IPOs have lower degree of underperformance than non-PE-backed IPOs. We also find that size, liquidity and leverage have a positive impact on the post-IPO performance after the financial crisis, whereas issue amount and capital issue year are negatively correlated to CARs before and during the crisis. We also find significant effects of PE firm nationality on CAR development. IPOs backed by India-dedicated PE firms perform best, while those backed by foreign PE firms perform worst and even underperform non-PE-backed IPOs. IPOs by foreign PE firms perform better if they co-invest with India-dedicated PE firms.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Jung Maximilian ◽  
Jyoti Gupta

<p><em>This paper investigates the overall market performance of Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) in Germany, by analyzing the short and long run performance of IPOs, utilizing the data from 2000-2013. Furthermore the study aims to distinguish and compare the performance of sponsor backed IPOs to non-sponsor backed IPOs, by placing a special focus on the value creating abilities of financial sponsors. The examined data set consists of 286 IPOs out of which 46 can be considered as IPOs which were backed by financial sponsor. The study suggests that, on average, IPOs significantly underperform their benchmarks. Furthermore, the evidence implies significant differences across the IPO groups with regard to performance and operational indicators. The multivariate regression shows that in the long run, private equity firms outperform their counterparts, signified by greater buy-and hold abnormal returns respectively recorded within the three-year period after the IPO. </em></p>


2021 ◽  
pp. 353-369
Author(s):  
Lin Lin

This chapter focuses on the development of non-bank financial institutions, particularly venture capital (VC), angel capital, private equity, and foreign funds, and their role in funding entrepreneurial ventures in China. It discusses the development of the venture capital market and the evolution of domestic and foreign funds in China. It examines the exits of VC-backed companies through initial public offerings (IPOs) and mergers and acquisitions and explores the connection between the stock market and VC market in China. It also evaluates recent institutional improvements and regulatory reforms for facilitating access to finance for small enterprises in China, especially the recent reforms to the stock market.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document