Meniere's Disease – What You Need to KnowP. J. Haybach, Vestibular Disorders Association, 1998. ISBN 0 9632611 18. Price: $24.95.

1999 ◽  
Vol 113 (7) ◽  
pp. 699-699
Author(s):  
Gail Armsden
2019 ◽  
Vol 128 (9) ◽  
pp. 869-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard T. Zhu ◽  
Vincent Van Rompaey ◽  
Bryan K. Ward ◽  
Raymond Van de Berg ◽  
Paul Van de Heyning ◽  
...  

Background:According to population-based studies that estimate disease prevalence, the majority of patients evaluated at dizziness clinics receive a single vestibular diagnosis. However, accumulating literature supports the notion that different vestibular disorders are interrelated and often underdiagnosed.Objective:Given the complexity and richness of these interrelations, we propose that a more inclusive conceptual framework to vestibular diagnostics that explicitly acknowledges this web of association will better inform vestibular differential diagnosis.Methods:A narrative review was performed using PubMed database. Articles were included if they defined a cohort of patients, who were given specific vestibular diagnosis. The interrelations among vestibular disorders were analyzed and placed within a conceptual framework.Results:The frequency of patients currently receiving multiple vestibular diagnoses in dizziness clinic is approximately 3.7% (1263/33 968 patients). The most common vestibular diagnoses encountered in the dizziness clinic include benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), vestibular migraine, vestibular neuritis, and Ménière’s disease.Conclusions:A review of the literature demonstrates an intricate web of interconnections among different vestibular disorders such as BPPV, vestibular migraine, Ménière’s disease, vestibular neuritis, bilateral vestibulopathy, superior canal dehiscence syndrome, persistent postural perceptual dizziness, anxiety, head trauma, and aging, among others.


2020 ◽  
Vol 267 (S1) ◽  
pp. 197-211
Author(s):  
Marly F. J. A. van der Lubbe ◽  
Akshayaa Vaidyanathan ◽  
Vincent Van Rompaey ◽  
Alida A. Postma ◽  
Tjasse D. Bruintjes ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Classifying and diagnosing peripheral vestibular disorders based on their symptoms is challenging due to possible symptom overlap or atypical clinical presentation. To improve the diagnostic trajectory, gadolinium-based contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the inner ear is nowadays frequently used for the in vivo confirmation of endolymphatic hydrops in humans. However, hydrops is visualized in both healthy subjects and patients with vestibular disorders, which might make the clinical value of hydrops detection on MRI questionable. Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of clinical and radiological features, including the in vivo visualization of endolymphatic hydrops, for the classification and diagnosis of vestibular disorders. Methods A literature search was performed in February and March 2019 to estimate the prevalence of various features in healthy subjects and in common vestibular disorders to make a graphical comparison between healthy and abnormal. Results Of the features studied, hydrops was found to be a highly prevalent feature in Menière’s disease (99.4%). Though, hydrops has also a relatively high prevalence in patients with vestibular schwannoma (48.2%) and in healthy temporal bones (12.5%) as well. In patients diagnosed with (definite or probable) Menière’s disease, hydrops is less frequently diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging compared to the histological confirmation (82.3% versus 99.4%). The mean prevalence of radiologically diagnosed hydrops was 31% in healthy subjects, 28.1% in patients with vestibular migraine, and 25.9% in patients with vestibular schwannoma. An interesting finding was an absolute difference in hydrops prevalence between the two diagnostic techniques (histology and radiology) of 25.2% in patients with Menière’s disease and 29% in patients with vestibular schwannoma. Conclusions Although the visualization of hydrops has a high diagnostic value in patients with definite Menière’s disease, it is important to appreciate the relatively high prevalence of hydrops in healthy populations and other vestibular disorders. Endolymphatic hydrops is not a pathognomic phenomenon, and detecting hydrops should not directly indicate a diagnosis of Menière’s disease. Both symptom-driven and hydrops-based classification systems have disadvantages. Therefore, it might be worth to explore features “beyond” hydrops. New analysis techniques, such as Radiomics, might play an essential role in (re)classifying vestibular disorders in the future.


1991 ◽  
Vol 50 (Suppl-7) ◽  
pp. 16-26
Author(s):  
Kimihiro Nakae ◽  
Fumiko Masaki ◽  
Atsushi Komatsuzaki ◽  
Masahiko Yamamoto ◽  
Isamu Watanabe ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sreelatha Sirige ◽  
S. Rajesh Kumar ◽  
V. Krishna Chaitanya ◽  
Vasu Kumar Reddy

<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) are electromyographic responses to high-intensity acoustic stimuli to test vestibular system, otolith function and integrity of inferior vestibular nerve. These are easy to perform and non-invasive. In this study, we aimed at clinical application of VEMP to evaluate common peripheral vestibular disorders.<strong></strong></p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective observational study carried in ENT department during January 2015-November 2016 over 40 patients in age group between 30-70 years with history of vertigo who underwent regular neuro-otological examination and VEMP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of these, 25 diagnosed with BPPV, 11 with Meniere’s disease, and four with vestibular neuritis. Eight patients showed delayed VEMP responses. 28 (70%) patients had normal VEMP, 12 (30%) had abnormal VEMP responses. Out of 25 patients suffering from benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) posterior semi-circular canal was involved in 20 (80%) patients and lateral semi-circular canal in 5 (20%) patients.<strong> </strong>Abnormal VEMP was found in 5 (20%) patients involving posterior semi-circular canal and in 1 (20%) patient involving lateral semi-circular canal. In patients with Meniere’s disease stage I, Meniere’s disease was observed in 7 (63.6%), stage II in 2 (18.1%), and stage IV disease in 1 (9.09%) patient. In these patients, abnormal VEMP was found in 3 (42.8%) of 7 stage I, 1 (50%) of 2 stage II and 1 (100%) of stage IV patients.<strong> </strong>One (20%) patient had abnormal VEMP responses during study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VEMP are short-latency EMG that evaluates saccule and inferior vestibular nerve in peripheral vestibular nervous system. VEMP should be considered as complementary test along with conventional vestibular function tests in patients with peripheral vertigo.<strong></strong></p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Dlugaiczyk ◽  
Thomas Lempert ◽  
Jose Antonio Lopez-Escamez ◽  
Roberto Teggi ◽  
Michael von Brevern ◽  
...  

Despite the huge progress in the definition and classification of vestibular disorders within the last decade, there are still patients whose recurrent vestibular symptoms cannot be attributed to any of the recognized episodic vestibular syndromes, such as Menière's disease (MD), vestibular migraine (VM), benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), vestibular paroxysmia, orthostatic vertigo or transient ischemic attack (TIA). The aim of the present international, multi-center, cross-sectional study was to systematically characterize the clinical picture of recurrent vestibular symptoms not otherwise specified (RVS-NOS) and to compare it to MD and VM. Thirty-five patients with RVS-NOS, 150 patients with VM or probable VM and 119 patients with MD were included in the study. The symptoms of RVS-NOS had been present for 5.4 years on average before inclusion, similar to VM and MD in this study, suggesting that RVS-NOS is not a transitory state before converting into another diagnosis. Overall, the profile of RVS-NOS vestibular symptoms was more similar to VM than MD. In particular, the spectrum of vestibular symptom types was larger in VM and RVS-NOS than in MD, both at group comparison and the individual level. However, in contrast to VM, no female preponderance was observed for RVS-NOS. Positional, head-motion and orthostatic vertigo were reported more frequently by patients with RVS-NOS than MD, while external vertigo was more prevalent in the MD group. At group level, the spectrum of attack durations from minutes to 3 days was evenly distributed for VM, while a small peak for short and long attacks in RVS-NOS and a big single peak of hours in MD were discernible. In general, vertigo attacks and associated vegetative symptoms (nausea and vomiting) were milder in RVS-NOS than in the other two disorders. Some patients with RVS-NOS described accompanying auditory symptoms (tinnitus: 2.9%, aural fullness and hearing loss: 5.7% each), migrainous symptoms (photophobia, phonophobia or visual aura in 5.7% each) or non-migrainous headaches (14%), but did not fulfill the diagnostic criteria for MD or VM. Absence of a life time diagnosis of migraine headache and attack duration of &lt;5 min were further reasons not to qualify for VM. In some RVS-NOS patients with accompanying ear symptoms, attack durations of &lt;20 min excluded them from being diagnosed with MD. These findings suggest that RVS-NOS is a stable diagnosis over time whose overall clinical presentation is more similar to VM than to MD. It is more likely to be composed of several disorders including a spectrum of mild or incomplete variants of known vestibular disorders, such as VM and MD, rather than a single disease entity with distinct pathognomonic features.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document