Long-term evaluation of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of salivary stones

2007 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Schmitz ◽  
P Zengel ◽  
I Alvir ◽  
M Andratschke ◽  
A Berghaus ◽  
...  

AbstractExtracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is a rather new therapeutical method in the treatment of sialolithiasis. The objective was to evaluate retrospectively the results of the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy therapy performed with a Minilith SL 1 lithotripter on 167 out-patients with symptomatic stones (average size 5.94 mm) of the salivary glands over an observation period of seven years. A successful treatment with total stone disintegration was achieved in 51 (31 per cent) patients. In 92 (55 per cent) patients treatment was partially successful, with disappearance of the symptoms but a sonographically still identifiable stone. Treatment failure occurred in 24 (14 per cent) patients who then underwent surgery. The mean follow-up period was 35.6 months (minimum three, maximum 83), after which 83.2 per cent of the initially successfully treated patients were still free of symptoms.Therefore, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, as a non-invasive treatment alternative with few side effects, is an efficient technique for the therapy of sialolithiasis in selected patients.

2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reiko Tsumita ◽  
Nobuyuki Sugiura ◽  
Asami Abe ◽  
Masaaki Ebara ◽  
Hiromitsu Saisho ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. ZANETTI ◽  
E. MONTANARI ◽  
A. MANDRESSI ◽  
A. GUARNERI ◽  
A. CERESOLI ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 21-24
Author(s):  
Dr. Mudassar Saeed Pansota

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: There is disagreement in the use of ureteral double-J stent before the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), although most of the urologists suggest using stent in shock wave lithotripsy technique for stones bigger than 20mm, for preventing the risk of developing steinstrasse. To compare the success of ESWL with and without DJ stenting in proximal ureteric stone. METHODOLOGY: A total of 60 patients form both genders, between 15 to 55 years of age, with a single proximal ureteric stone, were included. Patients with solitary functioning kidney, multiple stones, pregnancy, pyonephrosis and sepsis were excluded. In Group-A, ESWL without DJ stenting was completed while in Group-B, ESWL with DJ stent placement was done. In all patients, at least 4 sessions were done fortnightly. Patients were followed regularly and final success was noted after one month of completion of ESWL sessions. RESULTS: The mean age was 36.85 ± 8.61 years. From 60 patients, 29 (48.33%) were men and 231 (51.67%) were women.Mean body mass index (BMI) was 28.30±2.20 kg/m . The average size of the stone was 12.47 ± 2.57 mm. Success (according to stone removal) of Group-A (ESWL without DJS) was seen in 26 (86.67%) patients while in Group-B (ESWL with DJS) was seen in 16 (53.33%) patients with P-value of 0.005. CONCLUSION: This study concluded that success (in terms of stone clearance) of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) without DJ stenting is higher compared to with DJ stenting in upper ureteric stone.


1994 ◽  
pp. 529-531
Author(s):  
G. Zanetti ◽  
A. Trinchieri ◽  
E. Montanari ◽  
A. Guarneri ◽  
E. Austoni ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 148 (3 Part 2) ◽  
pp. 1011-1014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianpaolo R. Zanetti ◽  
Emanuele Montanari ◽  
Andrea Guarneri ◽  
Alberto Trinchieri ◽  
Alberto Mandressi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document