scholarly journals Is a train-the-trainer method of teaching an effective way of implementing the correct use of the ‘Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool’ (‘MUST’) in care homes?

2009 ◽  
Vol 68 (OCE1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Lee ◽  
F. Scott
2009 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 300-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Lee ◽  
Fiona Scott

Malnutrition is frequently undetected in care homes. It is recommended that residents are screened on admission and at suitable intervals thereafter. It is aimed to implement the ‘Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool’ (‘MUST’) in all care homes in Norfolk in order to fulfil this recommendation. Following a pilot of successful (but time-consuming) ‘MUST’ training a train-the-trainer package was developed as a practical way of achieving this goal. Courses were held in 2007, each comprising a study day and an assessment of each trainer delivering training. Trainers were provided with a dossier of training support materials. Data were collected at the study day and 3 months after the course to evaluate its effectiveness. Sixty-seven trainers were trained, all of whom rated the course as effective in preparing them to deliver training. At their assessments 96% were able to explain ‘MUST’ accurately. Of the new trainers 44% returned follow-up questionnaires and copies of sample care plans. The majority of care plans showed ‘MUST’ scores had been calculated accurately and appropriate nutrition care plans had been set up and evaluated. The train-the-trainer model is an effective method of training large numbers of care-home staff to use ‘MUST’. One of the unexpected benefits observed was the ownership taken by the trainers, which was demonstrated by the enthusiasm and confidence with which they subsequently trained their colleagues.


2008 ◽  
Vol 67 (OCE3) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. H. Merriman ◽  
H. F. Scott ◽  
K. E. Paterson ◽  
R. Lee ◽  
E. A. Wainwright

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Julia Walsh ◽  
Nariman D. Karanjia ◽  
Andrew Taylor ◽  
Callum Livingstone

Background. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and correlates of Se deficiency in patients referred for parenteral nutrition (PN) and to assess the response to a standard supplementation regimen. Methods. Adult patients (53) were recruited prior to commencing a PN regimen delivering 32 µg (0.4 µmol) Se per 24–36 h. Serum Se concentrations were measured before and daily during PN. Results. At baseline 49 (92%) patients had serum Se concentrations below the reference range (0.9–1.65 μmol/L). Se concentrations climbed during PN from 0.49±0.23 (mean ± SD) to 0.57±0.22 μmol/L (P<0.05), but in 48 (91%) patients the concentrations remained low at post-PN. Taking a Se concentration below 0.6 μmol/L as indicative of depletion in the presence of an acute phase response (APR), 37 (70%) patients had Se depletion at baseline and in 27 (51%), levels remained low at post-PN. Baseline serum Se predicted the length of hospital stay (r=-0.36, P<0.05). Increased “malnutrition universal screening tool” score predicted low Se (r=-0.93, P<0.05). Conclusions. Patients referred for PN have a high prevalence of Se deficiency, even when the APR is taken into account. Se supplementation of 32 µg Se per 24–36 h is insufficient for most patients. Baseline serum Se may have prognostic value.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document