Franciscan Institute Publications; Philosophy Series: The Franciscan Institute, St. Bonaventure, N.Y.:The Tractatus de Successivis, attributed to William of Ockham. - Franciscan Institute Publications; Philosophy Series: The Franciscan Institute, St. Bonaventure, N.Y.:The Tractatus de Praedestinatione et de Praescientia Dei et de Futuris Contingentibus, edited by Philotheus Boehner, O.F.M. - Franciscan Institute Publications; Philosophy Series: The Franciscan Institute, St. Bonaventure, N.Y.:The Transcendentals and their Function in the Metaphysics of Duns Scotus, by Allan B. Wolter, O.F.M., Ph.D. - Franciscan Institute Publications; Philosophy Series: The Franciscan Institute, St. Bonaventure, N.Y.:Intuitive Cognition, A Key to the Significance of the Later Scholastics, by Sebastian J. Day, O.F.M., Ph.D.

Philosophy ◽  
1949 ◽  
Vol 24 (90) ◽  
pp. 274-275
Author(s):  
T. Corbishley
Author(s):  
Richard Cross

Duns Scotus and William of Ockham engage with Aquinas’ thought in fundamentally negative ways. They never make distinctively Thomist positions their own, and when they use Aquinas’ thought, they do so merely as a way of sharpening their own theologies through the dialectical process of rejecting an opponent’s view. This chapter first considers the role of Aquinas’ thought in Scotus’ teaching on religious language and univocity, divine simplicity and omnipresence, the Trinity, cognitive theory, the question of the first object of cognition, angelic individuation, the beatific vision, the plurality of substantial forms, free will, and normative ethics. A second section discusses Aquinas’ place in Ockham’s teaching on common natures, intuitive cognition, divine ideas, and the nature of grace.


Author(s):  
Stephen F. Brown

Chatton was an English philosopher and theologian who developed a detailed critique of the work of William of Ockham, causing the latter to revise some of his earlier writings. Chatton was also at times an opponent of Peter Aureol and Richard of Campsall; he generally, though not always, followed John Duns Scotus and responded to his critics. He is known also for his writings on physics, where he held views in line with those of Pythagoras and Plato, and on the Trinity, where he was strongly attacked by Adam Wodeham.


Author(s):  
Rega Wood

An English Franciscan theologian, Wodeham was preoccupied with logical and semantic questions. He lectured for about a decade on Peter Lombard’s Sentences, first at London, then at Norwich and finally at Oxford. His lectures emphasized the dependence of the created world on God and the contingency of nature and salvation. John Duns Scotus and William of Ockham exerted the most important influences on Wodeham. He regarded Scotus as a vigorous thinker and respected him enough to accept his opinion in case of doubt. Proud to have learned logic from Ockham, Wodeham devoted considerable time to defending Ockham’s views from Walter Chatton, whom he saw as someone whose errors in logic arose from malice as well as ignorance. However, despite Wodeham’s reservations about Chatton, he was considerably influenced by him. Similarly, Wodeham modified his own opinion about sensory illusions in response to Peter Aureol, whom he saw as skilled and prudent but often mistaken, sometimes as a result of faulty logic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document