John Duns Scotus, Duns Scotus on the Will and Morality, selected and trans. Allan B. Wolter O.F.M. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 1986. Pp. x, 543. $54.95.

Speculum ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 62 (03) ◽  
pp. 766-767
Author(s):  
Gedeon Gál
Vivarium ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter King

AbstractMediaeval psychological theory was a “faculty psychology”: a confederation of semiautonomous sub-personal agents, the interaction of which constitutes our psychological experience. One such faculty was intellective appetite, that is, the will. On what grounds was the will taken to be a distinct faculty? After a brief survey of Aristotle's criteria for identifying and distinguishing mental faculties, I look in some detail at the mainstream mediaeval view, given clear expression by Thomas Aquinas, and then at the dissenting views of John Duns Scotus and William of Ockham. I conclude with some reflections on why the mainstream mediaeval view was discarded by Descartes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document