Early Christianity and the Dead Sea Scrolls

1994 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Geller

One of the fundamental innovations of the early Church was the abolition of an ancient, venerable institution—divorce, the practice of which was as widespread as marriage itself. The explicit ban on divorce found in the Gospels ran counter to legal systems of the known world, with one notable exception: among the sectarian group whose rules are enshrined in the Dead Sea Scrolls, a stance against divorce can be verified, implying that a legal innovation of early Christianity can be tracked back to its origins in Sectarian Judaism.By the time Christianity was emerging, marriage and divorce had already co-existed for a long time; in Mesopotamia marriage contracts had for two millennia been anticipating the possibility of divorce, with litigation governing the dissolution of marriage and division of properties. The best evidence, however, for the precursors to late Hellenistic (i.e. pagan, Jewish, and Christian) legal practice derives from a group of Neo-Babylonian marriage contracts dating from the seventh to third centuries B.C.

Author(s):  
Timothy H. Lim

‘The scrolls and early Christianity’ looks at what the Dead Sea Scrolls can tell us about Christianity. Any link between the Dead Sea Scrolls and the early Church generates a great deal of sensationalism. Some say that the scrolls are New Testament documents that depict Jesus. For instance, one fragment apparently tells of a ‘slain prince [or messiah]’. In fact, the prince was actually slaying someone else—oddities in vowel and suffix use in ancient Hebrew give rise to the misinterpretation. Another theory suggests that there was a common sectarian matrix in use at the birth of Christianity, meaning that one sect could use words very differently to another.


1963 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 165
Author(s):  
J. B. P. ◽  
Lucetta Mowry

2015 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Frey

The development of the biblical canon in ancient Judaism and early Christianity. A brief account of the process of the development of both the Jewish and the bipartite Christian canon is given. It is argued that due to insights gained from recent textual discoveries, especially the Dead Sea Scrolls (Qumran texts), earlier theories about the history of canonisation had to be reviewed. With the New Testament canon the authors focus on the influence of Marcion as well as the various other factors that played a role in the process of canonisation. It is shown that canonisation was the result of a complicated and variegated canonical process. But in spite of the problems of the criteria used and other factors involved, the biblical canon is theologically valuable and ‘well-chosen’.


1962 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 438
Author(s):  
Sherman E. Johnson ◽  
Lucetta Mowry

1957 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morris Ashcraft

Thought ◽  
1965 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 515-528
Author(s):  
Lucetta Mowry ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document