Prince Takahito Mikasa (ed.): Monarchies and socio-religious traditions in the ancient Near East. (Papers read at the 31st International Congress of Human Sciences in Asia and North Africa. Bulletin of the Middle Eastern Culture Center in Japen, Vol. I.) vii, 83 pp., 17 plates, chart. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, [1985].

1987 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 539-540
Author(s):  
J. F. Healey
Keyword(s):  
North Africa ◽  
Near East ◽  
Middle Eastern ◽  
International Congress ◽  
Ancient Near East ◽  
Human Sciences ◽  
Religious Traditions ◽  
Eastern Culture ◽  
Middle Eastern Culture

scholarly journals Pemikiran Abdurrahman Wahid tentang Pribumisasi Islam

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Ainul Fitriah
Keyword(s):  
Middle Eastern ◽  
Eastern Culture ◽  
The Core ◽  
Cultural Roots ◽  
Emergence Of Resistance ◽  
Local Cultures ◽  
Middle Eastern Culture

<p>This article explores the thought of “indigenization of Islam” of Abdurrahman Wahid’s. Indigenization of Islam is how the normative teachings of Islam as derived from God and it can be accommodated into the culture derived from human without losing its identity, respectively. As to Abdurrahmad Wahid or Gus Dur, Arabism (or process identifies with the Middle Eastern culture) would deprive us of his own cultural roots. More than that, Arabism is not suitable. Indigenization is not an effort to avoid the emergence of resistance of the power of local cultures, but instead that culture is not lost. The core of indigenization of Islam (Islamic natives) is not a necessity to avoid pillarization between religion and culture, because such polarization is not inevitable.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document