Bilateral generating functions involving Jacobi polynomials

1969 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. L. Manocha

In paper(1) it has been proved thatwhere the Jacobi polynomial is denned as ((3), p. 255)

1968 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 687-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. L. Manocha

The writer in his paper (4) has shown thatwhere the Jacobi polynomial is defined as ((5), p. 255).


1967 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 457-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. L. Manocha

In a previous paper (3) the writer has provedwhere is a Jacobi polynomial defined as ((4) p.255)


1953 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 301-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred Brafman

The Jacobi polynomials may be defined bywhere (a)n = a (a + 1) … (a + n — 1). Putting β = α gives the ultraspherical polynomials which have as a special case the Legendre polynomials .


1970 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 582-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Gasper

Let [3, p. 170, (16)](1.1)denote the Jacobi polynomial of order (α, β), α, β > – 1, and let g(k, m, n; α, β) be denned by(1.2)where Rn(α, β)(x) = Pn(α, β)(x)/Pn(α, β)(1). It is well known [1; 2; 4; 5; 6] that the harmonic analysis of Jacobi polynomials depends, at crucial points, on the answers to the following two questions.Question 1. For which (α, β) do we have(1.3)Question 2. For which (α, β) do we have(1.4)where G depends only on (α, β)?


1968 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. S. Lowndes

Equations which may be regarded as extensions of the dual series equations discussed by Noble (1) and the present author (2) are the triple series equations of the first kindand the triple series equations of the second kindwhere f, f1, g, g1h and h1 are all known functions,is the Jacobi polynomial (3).


Author(s):  
Richard Askey ◽  
George Gasper

The answers to many important questions in the harmonic analysis of orthogonal polynomials are known to depend on the determination of when formulas of the typesand their dualshold, where pn(x) and qn(x) are suitably normalized orthogonal polynomials or orthogonal polynomials multiplied by certain functions; e.g. e−pxLn(x).


1995 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 423-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Po Chen ◽  
H. M. Srivastava

The authors derive generalizations of some remarkable product formulas of Harry Bateman (1882-1946) for the classical Jacobi polynomials. They also show how the results considered here would lead to various families of linear, bilinear, and bilateral generating functions for the Jacobi and related polynomials.


1968 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 695-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul R. Milch

Let be the Jacobi polynomial as defined by Szegö in (7) (see equation (4) below.) Carlitz in (2) presented among others the following formulaAlthough, as Carlitz claims, this formula may be derived directly from the definition of Jacobi polynomials, a probabilistic proof such as presented below may shed some new light on formula (1), as well as suggest probabilistic proofs for other similar formulas of Jacobi polynomials, e.g. those given by Manocha and Sharma in (4) and (5) and by Manocha in (3). In addition, it is quite possible that this method of proof will result in the derivation of some new formulas for Jacobi polynomials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document