Ultrastructural Classification of Pituary Adenomas

Author(s):  
S. Arumugam ◽  
Sarasa Bharati Arumugam

Adenoaas of the pituitary are no longer classified based on their tinctorial affinity to dyes. With the advent of the newer methods of sophisticated technology, it is now possible to classify. These depending upon the type of hormone secreted based either on histochemical techniques or on ultrastructural characteristics. The latter provides an insight into the cytoplasmic organelle morphology which offers a delightful feast to the eye as well.This paper presents the ultrastructural characters of the pituitary adenoma as seen in Madras. 171 adenomas (124 males and 47 females) were seen during 1972-1989, classified at the light microscope level as 159 chromophobe, 2 basophilic, 4 eosinophilic and 6 mixed adenomas.Ultrastructural examination showed that the sparsely granular prolactin cell adenoma is the commonest adenoma to be encountered closely followed by the growth hormone cell adenoma, null cell adenoma, the mixed cell adenoma and others.

2011 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 336-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Zada ◽  
Whitney W. Woodmansee ◽  
Shakti Ramkissoon ◽  
Jordan Amadio ◽  
Vania Nose ◽  
...  

Object The 2004 WHO classification of pituitary adenomas now includes an “atypical” variant, defined as follows: MIB-1 proliferative index greater than 3%, excessive p53 immunoreactivity, and increased mitotic activity. The authors review the incidence of this atypical histopathological subtype and its correlation with tumor subtype, invasion, and surgical features. Methods The records of 121 consecutive patients who underwent transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas during an 18-month period were retrospectively reviewed for evidence of atypical adenomas. Results Eighteen adenomas (15%) met the criteria for atypical lesions; 17 (94%) of the 18 were macroadenomas. On imaging, 15 (83%) demonstrated imaging evidence of surrounding invasion, compared with 45% of typical adenomas (p = 0.004). Atypical tumors occurred in 12 female (67%) and 6 male (33%) patients. Patient age ranged from 16 to 70 years (mean 48 years). Nine patients (50%) had hormonally active tumors, and 9 had nonfunctional lesions. Four (22%) of the 18 patients presented to us with recurrent tumors. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated the following tumor subtypes: GH-secreting adenoma with plurihormonal staining (5 patients [28%]); null-cell adenoma (5 patients [28%]); silent ACTH tumor (3 patients [17%]), ACTH-staining tumor with Cushing's disease (2 patients [11%]), prolactinoma (2 patients [11%]), and silent FSH-staining tumor (1 patient [6%]). The MIB-1 labeling index ranged from 3% to 20% (mean 7%). Conclusions Atypical tumors were identified in 15% of resected pituitary adenomas, and they tended to be aggressive, invasive macroadenomas. More longitudinal follow-up is required to determine whether surgical outcomes, potential for recurrence, or metastasis of atypical adenomas vary significantly from their typical counterparts.


2017 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. 314
Author(s):  
I. Bayar ◽  
Y. Hasni ◽  
A. Ben Abdelkrim ◽  
M. Kacem ◽  
M. Chaieb ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans C Baertsch ◽  
Dhiraj J Pangal ◽  
Trey Garrett ◽  
Andrew Brunswick ◽  
Martin Rutkowski ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Since the 2017 W.H.O. classification of pituitary adenomas redefined null cell adenomas (NCAs) as negative for all adenohypophyseal hormones and the transcription factors (TFs) SF-1, PIT-1, and T-PIT, limited data exist characterizing these tumors1. We characterize NCAs in comparison to hormone negative adenomas (HNAs), which demonstrate negative hormone immunostaining in the context of positive TF immunoreactivity. Methods: Retrospective review of 22 patients with HNAs between 2011-2019. Samples were stained for PIT-1 and SF-1. Negative ACTH staining served as a proxy for T-PIT given demonstrated prior concordance of these stains2. Demographics, tumor characteristics, preoperative symptoms, and postoperative outcomes were assessed. Results: Fifteen samples (68%) stained negative for both PIT-1 and SF-1 and were classified as NCAs. Seven were positive for SF-1 (n=3), PIT-1 (n=3), or both (n=1) and were classified as HNAs. NCA patients were predominantly female (80%), while those with HNAs were predominantly male (57%). All tumors were macroadenomas, with mean maximal tumor diameter of 28mm in NCAs vs 23mm in HNAs (p=0.2705). NCAs were more likely to demonstrate suprasellar invasion (100% vs. 71%, p=0.0325), and although not statistically significant, cavernous sinus invasion (53% vs. 43%, p=0.6695), and higher MIB-1 proliferative index (2.271 vs. 1.971, p=0.733). The most common preoperative symptoms were headache (73% NCA, 71% HNA) and vision loss (53%, 40%). Postoperative improvements in headache (60% NCA, 71% HNA) and vision (53%, 50%) were comparable. Sixty-four percent of NCAs underwent gross total resection vs. 43% of HNAs (p=.3712). There were no recurrences or progressions in either group over 24mo. Few comparisons reached significance, potentially due to limited sample size. Conclusion: A majority of HNAs demonstrated negative TF immunostaining and met criteria for NCAs. NCAs may be more common in females and demonstrate more suprasellar invasion than HNAs, but otherwise, do not vary significantly. TF staining may be of limited clinical utility in identifying high-risk pathology, however future studies with larger cohorts are warranted. References: 1. Osamura RY, Lopes MBS, Grossman A, Matsuno A, Korbonits M, Trouillas J, Kovacs K (2017) Pituitary adenoma. In: Lloyd RV, Osamura RY, Klöppel G, Rosai J (eds) World health organization classification of tumours of endocrine organs, 4th edn. IARC, Lyon, pp 14-18. 2. Nishioka H, Inoshita N, Mete O, Asa SL, Hayashi K, Takeshita A, Fukuhara N, Yamaguchi-Okadad M, Takeuchi Y, Yamada S (2015) The Complementary Role of Transcription Factors in the Accurate Diagnosis of Clinically Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas. Endocr Path 26(4):249-55.


1991 ◽  
Vol 84 (10) ◽  
pp. 1239-1242 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOSEPH C. CHAO ◽  
CESAR V. REYES ◽  
MUMTAZ CHINOY

2014 ◽  
Vol 151 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.D. Chalkley ◽  
M. Kiupel ◽  
A.C.E. Draper

2014 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Feng ◽  
Lichuan Hong ◽  
Yonggang Wu ◽  
Chuzhong Li ◽  
Hong Wan ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 677-680
Author(s):  
Vikram Singh ◽  
Kirti Gupta ◽  
Pravin Salunke ◽  
Sivashanmugam S. Dhandapani

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document