Binocular summation in marmoset lateral geniculate nucleus

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elissa Belluccini ◽  
Natalie Zeater ◽  
Alexander N.J. Pietersen ◽  
Calvin D. Eiber ◽  
Paul R. Martin

Abstract In primates and carnivores, the main laminae of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) receive monocular excitatory input in an eye-alternating fashion. There is also evidence that nondominant eye stimulation can reduce responses to dominant eye stimulation and that a subset of LGN cells in the koniocellular (K) layers receives convergent binocular excitatory input from both eyes. What is not known is how the two eye inputs summate in the K layers of LGN. Here, we aimed to answer this question by making extracellular array electrode recordings targeted to K layers in the marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) LGN, as visual stimuli (flashed 200 ms temporal square-wave pulses or drifting gratings) were presented to each eye independently or to both eyes simultaneously. We found that when the flashed stimulus was presented to both eyes, compared to the dominant eye, the peak firing rate of most cells (61%, 14/23) was reduced. The remainder showed response facilitation (17%) or partial summation (22%). A greater degree of facilitation was seen when the total number of spikes across the stimulus time window (200 ms) rather than peak firing rates was measured. A similar pattern of results was seen for contrast-varying gratings and for small numbers of parvocellular (n = 12) and magnocellular (n = 3) cells recorded. Our findings show that binocular summation in the marmoset LGN is weak and predominantly sublinear in nature.

1996 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1089-1097 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun Wang ◽  
B. Dreher ◽  
W. Burke

AbstractThe aim of this project was to investigate the interaction between Y retinal ganglion cells and the cells of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGNd) of the cat, with particular reference to center-surround antagonism and intrageniculate inhibition. Responses of cells in the LGNd were studied by stimulating the retina with spots of light of constant contrast but varying size. The peak discharges of nonlagged X (XN) cells were strongly suppressed with increase in spot size but the responses of lagged X (XL) cells and nonlagged Y (YN) cells were inhibited much less strongly. The effect of the Y system on these responses was examined by producing a selective block of conduction in Y fibers in one optic nerve by means of a pressure cuff (Y-blocking). These effects were assessed by measuring the peak discharge rates and by calculation of a “peak suppression index.” Y-blocking had no significant effect on the peak suppression index of XL, cells in either lamina or on YN cells in the normal (not Y-blocked) lamina but had significant effects on the responses of XN cells, causing a decrease in peak suppression index, both for cells in laminae receiving their principal excitatory input from the Y-blocked eye (both lamina A and lamina A1 ) as well as those in lamina A (but not lamina A1 ) receiving their excitatory input from the normal eye. These effects were obtained with relatively large spots of light. Thus Y optic fibers have both intralaminar (monocular) and interlaminar (binocular) inhibitory effects on XN cells. In addition to these suppressive effects, the experiments also show that ipsilaterally projecting Y fibers have facilitatory effects on XN cells in lamina A when small spots of light, about optimal size for the XN cell, are used. These results suggest that the Y system plays a powerful role in shaping the responses of XN cells, possibly enhancing visual acuity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 404-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter W. Campbell ◽  
Gubbi Govindaiah ◽  
Sean P. Masterson ◽  
Martha E. Bickford ◽  
William Guido

The thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN) modulates thalamocortical transmission through inhibition. In mouse, TRN terminals in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) form synapses with relay neurons but not interneurons. Stimulation of TRN terminals in dLGN leads to a frequency-dependent form of inhibition, with higher rates of stimulation leading to a greater suppression of spike firing. Thus, TRN inhibition appears more dynamic than previously recognized, having a graded rather than an all-or-none impact on thalamocortical transmission.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document