COMPLEX DYNAMICS IN LUCAS’ TREE ASSET PRICING MODEL WITH DYNAMIC SELF-CONTROL PREFERENCES

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Marco Airaudo

This paper studies the global equilibrium dynamics implied by a Lucas’ tree asset pricing model where the representative agent is subject to temptation in consumption choices, and displays dynamic self-control preferences, as defined by Gul and Pesendorfer [(2004) Econometrica 72, 119–158.]. It shows that endogenous cycles of period 2 and higher, as well as chaotic dynamics exist provided temptation utility is sufficiently important (with respect to standard commitment utility) and sufficiently convex. For parameterizations leading to complex deterministic dynamics, a stochastic version of the model admits rational expectations equilibria displaying excess volatility with respect to the underlying fundamentals.

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos Axioglou ◽  
Spyros Skouras

AbstractWe develop a present-value asset pricing model with an econometrically useful representation that accommodates a plethora of stylized assumptions about beliefs. Using 20th century S&P500 data we use our model to compare the empirical fit of belief assumptions associated with rational expectations, asymmetic information, learning, behavioral effects and evolution. Among these, asymmetric information with evolution is particularly useful both in terms of statistical criteria and in terms of ability to explain the equity premium, excess volatility and predictability of returns. Our work suggests that popular relaxations of rationality can easily lead to econometric representations that may be impossible to work with in empirical research. Furthermore, replication of stylized facts may be too weak a requirement when evaluating such models. Fortunately, there exist simple relaxations of rationality that are sufficient to drastically improve the empirical fit of models with full rationality.


2017 ◽  
Vol 107 (8) ◽  
pp. 2352-2408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Adam ◽  
Albert Marcet ◽  
Johannes Beutel

Investors' subjective capital gains expectations are a key element explaining stock price fluctuations. Survey measures of these expectations display excessive optimism (pessimism) at market peaks (troughs). We formally reject the hypothesis that this is compatible with rational expectations. We then incorporate subjective price beliefs with such properties into a standard asset-pricing model with rational agents (internal rationality). The model gives rise to boom-bust cycles that temporarily delink stock prices from fundamentals and quantitatively replicates many asset-pricing moments. In particular, it matches the observed strong positive correlation between the price dividend ratio and survey return expectations, which cannot be matched by rational expectations. (JEL D83, D84, G12, G14)


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serena Brianzoni ◽  
Cristiana Mammana ◽  
Elisabetta Michetti

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document