The Magnesium Bromide-Lithium Bromide-Water System

1954 ◽  
Vol 76 (9) ◽  
pp. 2587-2590 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Heiks ◽  
A. B. Garrett
2003 ◽  
Vol 125 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Rizza

This paper presents an analysis of a cold thermal energy storage (TES) system operating in series with an R-123 chiller. A lithium bromide/water LiBr/H2O solution is used both as a refrigerant and as a cold thermal storage material. The refrigerant, liquid water, is extracted from the LiBr/H2O strong solution during the off-peak period. The liquid water and LiBr/H2O weak solution, a byproduct of the refrigerant recovery process, are used during the on-peak period to cool the building. Building waste heat is pumped by the R-123 compressor to a higher temperature during the off-peak period and is used in the generator to recover the thermal storage by reprocessing the stored solution to a higher lithium bromide concentration. The storage volumetric efficiency and system COP are determined and compared to storage systems based on water/ice and liquid water. The storage volumetric efficiency is greater than a water/ice system and far exceeds the value for a liquid water system. The proposed system, which uses an external heat pump as a source of generator heat, is also compared to another LiBr/H2O system that uses a self-contained internal heat pump (the compressor operates independently from the chiller and uses the liberated water refrigerant as its working fluid). The system presented here outperforms both the water/ice system and the internal heat pump LiBr/H2O system but is unable to match the liquid water system COP. However, it has other well-defined advantages over the liquid water system and appears to be a competitive alternative to conventional TES systems.


1988 ◽  
Vol 110 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Rizza

An analysis of a thermal storage system using a lithium bromide and water solution both as a refrigerant and as a storage material is considered. The proposed thermal storage system can be used to shift electric demand from periods of high demand to periods of low demand. The system is considered for both the summer cooling and winter heating season. The system’s evaporator and absorber are similar to that of a conventional heat-operated absorption refrigeration system; however, the generator heat is supplied by a self-contained electrically-driven vapor compression heat pump. The heat pump is operated during the off-peak period to recover the thermal storage by reprocessing the stored solution to a higher lithium bromide concentration. The water vapor liberated from solution in the generator is compressed and then condensed in the generator. The storage volumetric efficiency is determined and compared to storage systems based on water ice for the cooling season only and on a liquid water storage system for both cooling and heating. The storage volumetric efficiency of the proposed system is greater than or comparable to that of a thermal storage system based upon water ice and far exceeds the value for a thermal storage system based upon liquid water. The system can be constructed from standard HVAC components and appears to be a competitive alternative to a water ice storage system for summer cooling only, and it could be a competitive alternative to a liquid water system for combined summer and winter operations.


1994 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 1585-1604 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Cantù ◽  
M. Corti ◽  
E. Del Favero ◽  
A. Raudino

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document