scholarly journals The Bankruptcy Decision and Debt Contract Renegotiations *

1998 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elazar Berkovitch ◽  
Ronen Israel
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris S. Armstrong ◽  
Youngki Jang ◽  
Nir Yehuda

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
DAVID CHAVANNE

AbstractThis study examines how moral intuitions toward debt relief vary depending on whether a debt contract involves one country borrowing from another country or an individual borrowing from a bank. Participants respond to a vignette describing a basic debt dispute between a debtor and a lender. A judge in charge of settling the dispute decides to allow debt relief and participants express how fair they find the decision. Treatments vary (1) the debt context (international or person-bank), (2) the responsibility of lenders and debtors (whether their situations stem from bad luck or poor choices) and (3) whether a lender's profit motive is made salient. Results show that, across both international and person-bank debt, debt relief is perceived as being fairer when debtors are unlucky and when lenders are careless; profit salience, however, does not affect the perceived fairness of debt relief in either debt context. Results, when integrated with those from an initial related study, also point to anti-bank sentiment increasing the perceived fairness of debt relief when an individual borrows from a bank and to a consistent across-context ranking of the perceived fairness of debt relief in the scenario.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 686-711
Author(s):  
Carolyn M. Callahan ◽  
Gary F. Peters ◽  
Joseph H. Zhang

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-34
Author(s):  
Adam B. Badawi
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 2774-2813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Radhakrishnan Gopalan ◽  
Abhiroop Mukherjee ◽  
Manpreet Singh

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-246
Author(s):  
Ikka Tiaraintan Hariyanto ◽  
Novrys Suhardianto

This research aims to examine the influence of firm size, leverage, and corporate governance on earnings variability. We relate the earnings variability with the hypotheses of positive accounting theory and governance mechanism in Indonesia to identify factors that influence earnings variability. Using purposive sampling, we got 628 observations of Indonesian public firms during 2012 until 2014. This research uses common and fixed effect regression model to analyse the data. The results of this analysis show that the big firms have higher profit variability due to higher business and political risks. However, this finding applies only to samples with weak governance. Moreover, the greater the debt the company has, the greater the level of profit variability. This is due to the company's incentives to avoid breaching the debt contract, such as maintaining debt to equity ratio, working capital, or shareholder equity, by adopting aggressive accounting policies. Lastly, the CG mechanism does not affect the variability in earnings, indicating the lack of effective corporate governance in Indonesia. The CG mechanism in Indonesia has not generally been able to influence financial reporting behavior and capital market regulators need to take action to improve the effectiveness of corporate governance in Indonesia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document