Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance

Author(s):  
Eric H. Schumacher ◽  
Travis L. Seymour ◽  
Jennifer M. Glass ◽  
Erick J. Lauber ◽  
David E. Kieras ◽  
...  
1987 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 847-851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yili Liu ◽  
Christopher D. Wickens

We report here the first experiment of a series studying the effect of task structure and difficulty demand on time-sharing performance and workload in both automated and corresponding manual systems. The experimental task involves manual control time-shared with spatial and verbal decisions tasks of two levels of difficulty and two modes of response (voice or manual). The results provide strong evidence that tasks and processes competing for common processing resources are time shared less effectively and have higher workload than tasks competing for separate resources. Subjective measures and the structure of multiple resources are used in conjunction to predict dual task performance. The evidence comes from both single task and from dual task performance.


2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E. Meyer ◽  
David E. Kieras ◽  
Eric H. Schumacher ◽  
David Fencsik ◽  
Jennifer M. B. Glass

1988 ◽  
Vol 32 (19) ◽  
pp. 1466-1470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Spitz

The extent and nature of the ability to control the allocation of mental resources between the components of a dual task was investigated in three separate experiments. Using a variable priority (demand) methodology it was found that subjects could manipulate their performance level, however their ability to meet specific demand levels was limited. Training subjects under single or dual-task conditions using a wide range of task demand significantly improved dual task performance and degree of control over resource allocation as compared to performance following practice under a narrow range of task demands or under single task fixed demand conditions. Single task performance among all groups improved to the same degree. It was concluded that training subjects under a wide range of task demands increases the range of performance levels over which mental resources can be flexibly allocated for those tasks and improves time sharing performance. Implications for the design of training for complex task performance are discussed.


2001 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric H. Schumacher ◽  
Travis L. Seymour ◽  
Jennifer M. Glass ◽  
David E. Fencsik ◽  
Erick J. Lauber ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Oberauer ◽  
Katrin Gothe ◽  
Reinhold Kliegl

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra J. Thomson ◽  
Matthew T. Mazurek ◽  
Judith M. Shedden ◽  
Scott Watter

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document