Are Appearance-change Instruction Effects on Eyewitness Accuracy Moderated by Amount of Appearance Change?

Author(s):  
Molinaro ◽  
Andrea Arndorfer ◽  
Steve Charman
2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Catrambone ◽  
Matthew Kohlmyer ◽  
Michael Schatz ◽  
Marcus J. Marr

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 534-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torun Lindholm ◽  
Fredrik U. Jönsson ◽  
Marco Tullio Liuzza
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 218-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.D. Lefebvre ◽  
Y. Marchand ◽  
S.M. Smith ◽  
J.F. Connolly

2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 523-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Steblay ◽  
Jennifer Dysart ◽  
Solomon Fulero ◽  
R.C.L. Lindsay

1983 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zita E. Tyer ◽  
John A. Allen ◽  
Robert Pasnak

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Rebecca Spearing ◽  
Kimberley A. Wade

A growing body of research suggests that confidence judgements can provide a useful indicator of memory accuracy under some conditions. One factor known to affect eyewitness accuracy, yet rarely examined in the confidence-accuracy literature, is retention interval. Using calibration analyses, we investigated how retention interval affects the confidence-accuracy relationship for eyewitness recall. In total, 611 adults watched a mock crime video and completed a cued-recall test either immediately, after 1 week, or after 1 month. Long (1 month) delays led to lower memory accuracy, lower confidence judgements, and impaired the confidence-accuracy relationship compared to shorter (immediate and 1 week) delays. Long-delay participants who reported very high levels of confidence tended to be over-confident in the accuracy of their memories compared to other participants. Self-rated memory ability, however, did not predict eyewitness confidence or the confidence-accuracy relationship. We discuss the findings in relation to cue-utilization theory and a retrieval-fluency account.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document