An intersectional analysis of newspaper portrayals of the 2013 reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act.

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 344-355
Author(s):  
Melina R. Singh ◽  
Heather E. Bullock
2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha R. Burt ◽  
Janine M. Zweig ◽  
Kathryn Schlichter ◽  
Stacey Kamya ◽  
Bonnie L. Katz ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha R. Burt ◽  
Adele V. Harrell ◽  
Lisa Jacobs Raymond ◽  
Britta Iwen ◽  
Kathryn Schlichter ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha R. Burt ◽  
Janine M. Zweig ◽  
Kathryn Schlichter ◽  
Stacey Kamya ◽  
Bonnie L. Katz ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha R. Burt ◽  
Lisa C. Newmark ◽  
Lisa K. Jacobs ◽  
Adele V. Harrell

Author(s):  
Caroline Bettinger-López

International human rights treaties and monitoring bodies have repeatedly called upon governments to develop national plans of action to eliminate violence against women. Although the U.S. is a global leader in the violence against women arena, it has never developed a national plan of action. The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), despite its substantial contributions, does not contain some of the core features of a national action plan—such as a strategic vision for ending violence against women, or a declaration that violence against women is a human rights violation and a form of sex discrimination, or a set of goals or benchmarks to measure progress. This chapter examines the key elements of national action plans on violence against women, and ultimately argues that in the Trump era, a national action plan can best be developed through coordinated action at the state and local levels.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document