Discontinuous Low-frequency Delay Line with Continuously Variable Delay

Nature ◽  
1952 ◽  
Vol 169 (4291) ◽  
pp. 148-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. L. JANSSEN
Author(s):  
F.Y. Cho ◽  
B.J. Hunsinger
Keyword(s):  

1966 ◽  
Vol 54 (8) ◽  
pp. 1118-1119 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.D. Anderson ◽  
D.M. Brady ◽  
W. New ◽  
R. Newcomb

2000 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 1352-1360 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Ortega ◽  
J.L. Cruz ◽  
J. Capmany ◽  
M.V. Andres ◽  
D. Pastor

1973 ◽  
Vol 61 (7) ◽  
pp. 1045-1046 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Bar-Chaim ◽  
M. Brunstein ◽  
J. Grunberg ◽  
A. Seidman ◽  
M. Birk

1990 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-131
Author(s):  
Shailey Minocha ◽  
S C Dutta Roy ◽  
Balbir Kumar

2015 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. 271-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Palanca-Castan ◽  
Christine Köppl

Localization of sound sources relies on 2 main binaural cues: interaural time differences (ITD) and interaural level differences. ITD computing is first carried out in tonotopically organized areas of the brainstem nucleus laminaris (NL) in birds and the medial superior olive (MSO) in mammals. The specific way in which ITD are derived was long assumed to conform to a delay line model in which arrays of systematically arranged cells create a representation of auditory space, with different cells responding maximally to specific ITD. This model conforms in many details to the particular case of the high-frequency regions (above 3 kHz) in the barn owl NL. However, data from recent studies in mammals are not consistent with a delay line model. A new model has been suggested in which neurons are not topographically arranged with respect to ITD and coding occurs through assessment of the overall response of 2 large neuron populations - 1 in each brainstem hemisphere. Currently available data comprise mainly low-frequency (<1,500 Hz) recordings in the case of mammals and higher-frequency recordings in the case of birds. This makes it impossible to distinguish between group-related adaptations and frequency-related adaptations. Here we report the first comprehensive data set from low-frequency NL in the barn owl and compare it to data from other avian and mammalian studies. Our data are consistent with a delay line model, so differences between ITD processing systems are more likely to have originated through divergent evolution of different vertebrate groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document